Originally Posted by kazooplayer
Try just rubbing the base of the shaft, with fingers along the top of the shaft; you can rub the glans, but only the top side. See if you can’t get the popping out that I’m talking about… I’ll try give a better description when I’m not so tired. The length expansion I think is dependent on rubbing the top side, though I can’t give a good reason why.
I think some people are just wired differently. I’ve tried repeatedly to reproduce what you describe, and in all honesty I have a few problems with it:
1) stimulating the top (dorsal side) of the penis alone (even including the dorsal side of the glans) does not provide sufficient stimulation to get or maintain an erection.
If I’m already highly aroused I can get some interesting, but very subtle, sensations before erection subsides. There is no more “popping out” than would happen if you took a 100% erection and pushed down on it to take a measurement (I’m assuming you mean something more than this, right?)
There are times when it is particularly pleasurable and rewarding to focus on the dorsal root and lower shaft, but this always includes stimulation of the perineum area and the underside of the lower shaft as well.
2) I find it virtually impossible to avoid the underside of my penis when self-stimulating, and, after trying repeatedly to so, can see no benefit. Again, perhaps people have different sexual circuitry.
3) I have no idea what “popping out” means. It’s just too vague of a description for me to confirm whether I’m doing that. But the exercise I outlined in the OP does produce cumulatively higher and higher levels of erection—firmer, harder, seemingly longer (“popping out”? maybe…), and tremendous glans expansion.
The description of “curving back toward the body” is also problematic for me. My penis is very straight, with no curve at all. It also rather thick. I have a hard time accepting that lack of the curvature you describe in my case implies that I’m not performing an exercise properly.
It may be that, as you said, we’re using different approaches to reach the same (or similar) ends. I just feel that all the explanations of balloooning so far have been too vague, and put too much of an emphasis on certain features (like the dorsal side, avoiding the underside, etc.), that automatically disqualify many people who are not wired to respond similarly. While some people just get it, and they’re off and running with penises popping, other’s sincerely and earnestly try to no avail. I’m not convinced that intelligent, experienced, and curious would-be-ballooners are necessarily doing anything wrong when they fail—the problem might be with the description. My guess is that this is partially due to different sexual circuitry (different “wiring”) and partially due to the mystifying language that people seem to resort to when explaining it.
Maybe what I’ve described in my OP is not properly called ballooning. But I’m pretty sure that it’s reproducible. I’d like to think that anyone can do it, provided they strengthen their pelvic muscles and learn to reverse kegel.
And for those who, like me, have trouble with most of the explanations about ballooning that are floating around, maybe this will do for now.
Perhaps we should call this “Extreme Edging” instead. I don’t give a fuck what it’s called. It works as described.