Dance,
>So then you are referring to previous hanging models when you say you had tunica stretch from hanging right? Or do you still feel that way about the bigger also?<
You know the problem with all of this is the different perceptions gained from our own experiences. I went through so much over a long period of time that is is hard to correlate everything in my mind. I know that my biggest limiting factor, other than pure comfort, was the fatigue from hanging on the upper shaft. The lower shaft even into my body would be fatigued, but not to the extent of the upper shaft. Later, when I made bigger hangers, it still was a problem for me. My last hanger that I used for gains was 4.5 inches long. I still had tunica stretch. Of course, I was using a lot of weight.
>It seems that your design has done exactly what you set out to do and that is, “putting LESS stress on this area and more on the shaft toward the base.” I notice you capitolize “Less” implying that there is still some stress.<
That is the idea. It seems the upper shaft should still get plenty of stress if the hanger seats on either side of the head.
>My penis when pulled and wrapped is almost completely covered by the hanger. A little before the head and between my body and the hanger is all that is left uncovered. So if that is the case and my penis is flaccid and compressed by the hanger, then how is it possible to stretch the tunica? <
Well, there is not one single point or area that grasps the shaft. It is grasped all along the area of attachment and the front thumbs seat behind the head. If the upper shaft did not receive stress, then the head would never feel any pressure at all. I don’t think this is ever the case unless you are using very low weights.
In order for the area of attachment to not receive any stress, the anterior portion of the hanger would have take it all. It does not.
>I feel no pressure whatsoever on the tunica, or upper shaft. The only feeling I get is in the ligs because of the effectiveness of the hanger. I guess if the hanger did attach in some way to the upper shaft and assist in the hanging I could see the point, but the way it worked for me was all the pressure was at the base. <
That is interesting. If you wanted the upper shaft to get more stress, you could either toe-in the hanger to where the front thumbs provided most of the grip, or loosen the hanger some to where the hanger slides down more behind the head. This would defeat some of the purpose however.
>In fact I thought we always wanted to avoid that pressure in the upper shaft. <
As I said, I always had too much stress on that area. So, I developed means to lessen it and put more on the base.
>I never could get it to dig in or create any tension in that area (except when I wrapped wrong and you corrected me by telling me not to have any wrap between the hanger and the head. The skin of the shaft goes over the head and you said that is ok and natural so where is this stress of the tunica? <
If the hanger is pulling behind the head at all, there is stress on the entire tunica. It will not be the totality of the weight because the rest of the shaft under the hanger is absorbing some. But it will be a significant amount. If the upper shaft is smaller than toward the base, this would make sense. The upper shaft would not need as much stress.
>I always wanted the hanger to work the way you describe (upper part sort of digging in and attaching below the head or resting on the ridge. I always thought that was the way it was supposed to work based on an old description. So it sound as if I missed out on some gains. However, for a long time I asked you why it would not work this way and then come to the conclusion that I must have misunderstood your previous description.<
I don’t remember that conversation in particular, and it appears to be a case of opposite experiences. But it may be that you just did not use enough weight to where the front thumbs came into play. Then there might not have been enough stress on the area to feel it.
>If it worked that way with me then I can see your point. However, like I say it just compressed the whole skin of the shaft and as I hung the the skin moved forward even over the head and all the pressure was on the base.<
Now it seems you are talking about something entirely different. First, if there is enough weight that the skin is moving forward over the head, then the front thumbs should come in contact on either side of the head. If the pressure is then felt on the base, that is probably skin pressure which will only result in skin stretch. That is fine until the skin has stretched enough to where the weight affects the ligs.
The skin is the first limiting factor which must be stretched. Neither the tunica or the ligs will be affected until the skin is stretched.
>In our previous conversations, and some you had with others, you said this was normal and fine, but now it sounds as if you are saying not optimal. <
I know some of that was not very clear. My point was and is, the true gains will not occur until stresses are placed on the tunica and ligs without the skin interferring. But the skin must be stretched first. I feel like some guys only stretched skin when using things like the swimcap wrap etc. That the internal structures and head were not grasped in order to transfer stress to them rather than just skin.
Perhaps for guys with a larger upper shaft, the Starter would be better. Allow for more stress on this larger area than with a regular hanger. It is an interesting point which I had not considered before. I still think the regular would be fine for a total tunica stretch by toeing in slightly. Then, if the upper shaft became too stressed, you could correct the toe to even or toe-out.
Bigger