Ectospasm]
>The difficulty in assessing these different methods is the lack of a controlled study; controlled as in double blind or other statistical metric. Without that it’s pissing in the wind.
Ecto, It would be nice to have proper controlled studies as you suggest but it is unlikely because there is little chance for profit in it. The beauty of fora like Thunders is that we can discover things in a more amateurish way by sharing our experiences as guinea pigs and come up with approaches that work for a lot of us.
>In my post earlier, I noted the possible positive advantage from regular stretching routine. Then, reading through threads linking the references above, I saw, Marinera came to the same conclusion in 2008. But extenders apparently do not work on the principle of hanging where there is maximum tension but rather elongation below max but for longer duration. I’m ok with that if it works.
Yes that seems consistent with a lot of others have found. However there are others that have not had success. What is not clear is whether is due to poor technique or something to do with their penises.
There is also this concept of “less is more” that seems to work for many where lower tension is used in extending.
Laeh’s idea of a below the knee ADS is of interest to me also where in effect it is cyclically stretching as you walk. I find walking with golf weights has a similar effect from the dynamic load. What I am interested in is how low a tension you can use for long periods (say 8 hours at a time) and still see growth. I am hoping if you start with conventionial extending and then swap to an ADS mode without any noticeable break that you will still get this effect. If it works it makes it much easier for most of us to do long periods of PE while we go about other