150 Jelqs in 9 Mins

Is that too quick? If, so how long should I be looking to take?

That works out at 3.6 seconds per jelq, which is perfectly fine. 3-5 seconds I would say is the optimum time range.

Seems o.k.

That is fine. Technically, you could probably even go a little quicker, but I would stay in the middle of the 3-5 sec jelq range for now.

That is good.

150 in 9 mins??? Wow, that would take me 20 mins at least!! I still get erections way too easily and sometimes takes them a few mins to go away. A real pain. Anyone have any ideas?? I wouldn’t consider myself a newb at this point…

I was doing a search for a thread I saw about whether it was OK to do less than 200 jelqs if they were 5 second jelqs instead of 3 second jelqs, and couldn’t find it.

But the answers from vets were that it was acceptable.

My question is, would it be OK to end up doing more jelqs if the jelqs are shorter than 3 seconds if someone is jelqing for time?

I ask because there are times that I am either too erect, or not erect enough to do 3 second jelqs. While I am thinking that being not engorged enough would just make things more length oriented, which in my case might be OK since I can’t really manually stretch very well.

But if I try do do 3 sec jelqs before I am at the right engorgement level, I get too erect because it is more like masturbation, I guess. So the question is, is it OK to end up doing more jelqs while trying to jelq to the right engorgement level?

Also, I see this statement in the Newbie routine stickied at the top of the Newbie forum:

Just a question, is someone no longer considered a Newbie after being at the 10 minute stretch/ 30 minute jelq level for two or three months? Or after two or three months of total PE from the 5 minute stretch/ 10 minute jelq ,initial stage, on through the 10 minute stretch/ 30 minute jelq level?

It was only recently that I could do it, otherwise I was the same as you, but ever since I started jelqing whilst reading a book I rarely ever get too erect to not jelq.