Third time's a charm?

For the vast majority (perhaps totality) of you who don’t recall me, here is a brief intro.

My first go at PE several years ago (manual) stopped with a suspected thrombosed vein.

My second go a few years ago (hanging) stopped when my body ended up being ill-suited for hanging. ShowR not growR, plenty of loose/flexible skin, too-large hands, etc.

This is my third attempt, and I’m going to have a go at pumping. I had considered replicating Vacuum Pumping 101 in the well-summarised-but-currently-sparse wiki , but I got sidetracked by this that and the other thing. I think if I get actively engaged, I will be more apt to fill out that wiki if only for my own edification. Are there any other big pumping threads (like Condom Pumping or Selecting Your Cylinder Size, for example) that I should read as a complement to avocet8’s fantastic pumping thread?

Speaking of which: What might one recommend for a good 2"-diameter automatic pump? Preferrably from a company that ships reliably to Asia (as this is where I now live). No time for self-made — been there done that. I have more money than time these days anyhow.

I thank any and all who took the time to read my re-re-hello, and wish you a long, hard, thick stay at Thunder’s ;)

-Jab

Welcome back Jabari. I remember you. Yes, the wiki needs your help. :)

I’m knew here but I admire your persistence. I’m sorry if I’m being forward, but I’m a similar size to you and I was wandering if your size has been a constant problem to you throughout your life and if most women you have been with have brought up there thoughts about your unit to your attention.

Thankyou

And I apologise, there shoud be no ‘k’ infront of ‘new’

You said your size in 2005 was 6x5 and your goal was 9x6, did you get more close of this goal or not?

Good luck, Jabari. Keep us posted.

Thanks for the words of encouragement everyone!

Thunder: IIRC, you’re (or were?) mainly a pumper — has pumping changed much since I did my most extensive research about 4 years ago?

jbuck: I was actually about 6x5.25 — currently about 6x5.5. I’ve only ever had no comments (neutral reaction) or a comment on how thick it is. A few girls have said it was big just to stroke my ego, but even they obviously felt it was big enough that I would believe their reaction. I’m fairly content with my size — the main reason I want to grow is that some of my preferred positions and preferred styles are better suited to larger equipment.

Phyriel: As you can see above; hell no! Like I’d mentionned in my second go, I’m not so small that it bothers me (especially since I now live in Asia).

growing09: Thanks, I hope to!

I guess I’ll bring my pump query to the pumper’s forum. Cheers all.

-Jab

Vacuum is still vacuum Jabari. I think guys are getting a better handle on routines and pressures now. Worth some reading.

Thanks Thunder!

I’ve updated the pumping wiki, but when I try to post about it in the pumper’s forum, it tells me that it’s a duplicate, and kicks me back to the forum. Are new threads moderated in the member forums now? That would be news to me :P

Maybe I’ll try clearing my cookies. Anyways, for those of you interested, the raw material from avocet8’s Vacuum Pumping 101 is in the wiki now, with some basic structure.

-Jab

Jabari, nice job on the wiki entry! Very well written.

Jabari,

I reverted your Pumping entry in the Wiki. It’s (as stated) a verbatim rip of Avocet’s Pumping 101 thread and it is not up to you to re-licence the work of other people. If you want to write a pumping entry, that would be great but please don’t cut and paste into the wiki and then edit from there.

@ Iguana: As stated, the works belonged to avocet8. I agree that it was well-written.

@ memento: You should have done your homework then — the article structure was mine. I’ll thank you to revert that.

No word on what’s happening with my inability to post in the pumper’s forum then?

-Jab

To emphasize what Mem said: What I write for Thunder’s is NOT to appear in the wiki, in any form. My stand on this is not negotiable.

Welcome back to Thunder’s, however. :)

I probably shouldn’t be sticking my nose here but -

My compliment was based on the improvement in the presentation of the information. The structure in the wiki was much better and more readable that the original thread. Not to offend Avocet8, his thread is awesome, but the wiki entry was an improvement. Jabari clearly stated the information was written by Avocet8. I would think as long as credit goes where it is deserved, and that people can benefit from the information, that the entry would be welcomed.

Not welcomed by me, with or without attribution.

Thank you for your understanding in this matter.