In theory it would. I’ve wondered this myself and implemented it myself for a few months. Unfortunately at the time I was stretching all wrong and completely wasting my time with incorrect message.
From what I understand about both PE and HGH, this is my hypothesis on why it would be effective.
Hyperplasia is the multiplying of cells. This is what is thought to be gained from the injections of HGH as an adult. Hence why it is used in body building. When you’re building muscle your tearing down the muscle strands and they are being rebuilt bigger and stronger in order to withstand the higher level of stress. So when a bodybuilder plateus and can no longer grow, they introduce HGH to stimulate the multiplication of cells, allowing the tissues to continue to gain new size.
An unfortunate side effect is that hyperplasia occurs in all the tissues in the body, causing distended guts, growth of hands and feet. Even the skull can grow.
Common misconception with new PE’ers is relating penis growth with muscle growth. Which is not what we’re doing here. We are going for hyperplasia in the tissue, not muscle hypertrophy.
By over stretching the tissues we are causing micro tears. The cells multiply to fill in the gaps and heal. Atleast this is how I understand PE and believe that it works.
Therefor elevated HGH would increase hyperplasia rates and promote PE gains.. In theory.
The problem is, we really can’t prove if this information is true or not, because the only true experiment to prove all this would kill the subject or just be possible all together. Every person and creature is created differently. If you chopped off both our arms, cut the biceps open and counted every single muscle strand, we would have completely different count.
So the only way to test the HGH to hyperplasia theory would be to cut that arm off, count strands. Reattach arm, apply HGH and cell damage. Then cut it off and recount.
So really the jury is out on if it is effective for bodybuilding, or other spot growth treatments.
I did read about an interesting study. Where a weight was tied to a birds wing where they let it hang for an extended amount of time. On dissection of the bird they found 90% more muscle fibers, that were 300% bigger on the weighted wing when compared to the other. Although fiber counts from one side of the body to the other still won’t be exact, the difference is hard to dispute
So that would lead us to believe that hyperplasia is induced by physical strain. Obviously results may differ with humans so the study is inconclusive as far as PE is concerned.
So you will read on the internet studies and doctors who say it is all false and it’s hard to know who to believe.
I’ve been in bodybuilding a really long time and regardless of what some studies say, I’ve seen the power of HGH first hand and I know it’s very effective in growing tissues that aren’t supposed grow anymore.
So if we are inducing hyperplasia by stretching the tunica and other tissues it would only make sense that a hormone that causes this process to rapidly increase would be beneficial.
Although I can prove none of this scientifically. My hundreds of hours of studying leads me to believe this is most likely the case, and makes logical sense to me.
So I’m going with it