Kojack:
>>>Not that a narrow hipped woman will be “smaller” of course or vice versa, but the “maximum limits” are always set by those two pelvic bones on each side.
I drew a pic that is two diagrams superimposed so that you can actually see this ultimate “limiting factor” - the pelvic bone. It was quite interesting (and for me, disturbing) making this pic. (btw I got the resources from grays anatomy website and some random sexual anatomy website)
>>>In saying all of this, I am sure that I sound a little crazy in wanting to predict size. I do know that 80-90% of all healthy women out there could accomodate LOTS.
You’re not crazy. I am also obsessed wih the female reproductive system (or at east, the really useful interesting bits) :D
I think the fact that I took the time to make the pic shows that clearly! but my motivations aren’t for guessing the probable size of a mate, for the following reasons…
You were right in saying that most women can take lots. in fact, you have to realise that given that the soft tissues can stretch and expand a phenominal amount, that the bones are the only real factor. If a vagina is filled to absolute maximum capacity (pushing agains the bones) then the asshole and tract will be squished into nothingness.
If the numbers aren’t legible in the pic they read:
115mm x 90-115(or is it 175?)mm
Even if you take the smallest measurement, that means an average womans pelvis could accommodate a cylindrical object with a girth of about 11”… (with room to spare to the sides)
This is of course not taking into account the limiting factors of the soft tissue.. If the object were irregular in shape, so that it lined up with the irregular opening of the bone structure, you could probably fit even more! And this is, remember for the average woman!
In a really thrashed, stretched out loose-as-can-be vagina, something with 10” or more girth is easily an insertable reality (just watch some movies as I suggested in another thread of “Ty” or “Dennio”)
This explains how double and even triple fisting is possible.
I won’t even try to discuss the volume capacity of the complete vagina in depth, because there are many other factor involved which are not as concrete and calculable as solid bone. This stuff I just said only applies to the very opening.
When you also take into consideration that the opening is by far the tightest part (in terms of tissue) then you start getting paranoid and feeling very inadequate :)
Say the average vagina can take something to the depth of 8” for arguments sake. The fact that these tissues are extremely stretchable means that sideways (on the horizontal plane while standing up, if you will), the vaginal canal can stretch to accomodate just about anything you can throw at it. Because there are no bones acting as a limiting factor, it would theoretically be possible to continually stretch these tissues out over time, increasing the overall capacity. (similar to ear and lip stretching, and much more easily done than penis enlargement)
What is the absolute limit? Who knows! Given my experience I could take a somewhat informed guess that if the average vagina were taken and stretched to absolute maximum capacity over years and years, the volume that it could accomodate could increase into the range of several liters. (!!!)
Just how many I won’t say, but I did do a water displacement measurement on my (fairly average) fist and it was 300ml (almost 1/3rd of a liter) and I have seen up to 3 hands the size of mine inserted, and the only reason more couldn’t fit was because of the limited opening (bone).. there may have still been plenty of room up inside…
These facts I have known for quite a long time, and they tend to depress me, just because I’m that sort of guy…
Knowing that no matter how big your dick gets, that you could never ever possibly ever fill any woman to breaking point is somewhat dissapointing to me.
My only comforts, and the only reason I could say there is some sort of ‘excuse’ if you will, is that the vagina is designed to do these things since it’s primary function is the passage of babies.
The only other thing that keeps me happy is the fact that what gives a woman pleasure is the stimulation of nerves, which are of course within the tissues. It is fairly obvious that the harder you stimulate (push against) these tissues the more stimulation, so logically the bigger you are, the more you can stimulte them and the better you’ll feel. It motivates me to keep going.
Not to mention the fact that packing a vagina absolutely full to the limits is usually more than most girls can take anyway; it’s like a sensory overload and it just becomes white noise interpreted as pain.
Still, one could argue that god should have made vaginas smaller for guys to have more fun/confidence, and have babies born extremely small :D LoL j/k…. stupid evolution.. anyways…..
This is turning into a rediculously long rant so I will shut up now. Thanks for your time anyone who bothered reading this obsessive rubbish ;)