Heya Swaffel
Well, as you said, yes, I did some background search. I’m a kind of a nitpicker :-)
I will therefore use the Latin terms in the following answer. Not to brag (my Latin is pig Latin on it’s best days) but in order to use the international anatomy standard naming when it comes to anatomy.
So let’s have a closer look at the mesenterium:
- The mesenterium is part of the peritoneum structure. The peritoneum has the function to enclose the entire gastrointestinal structure and offer mechanical support and protection to the coelomic organs. Peritoneum and mesenterium contain blood vessels as well as lymphatic vessels. To say it in simple words: the "walls" contain the "supply wires and tubes" too.
- The mesenterium is strictly part of the intraperitoneal structures, neither being subperitonela or retroperitoneal. In simple words, the mesenterium is always on the inner the peritoneum. It is attached to the inner side of the walls of the peritoneum and connecting to jejunum and ileum (small intestines), transverse colon and sigmoid colon (the part of the colon just before the abdomen) as well as connected to the appendix through the ileum part of the mesenterium.
- Naturally, being not only a mechanical but a transport structure of the body, the mesenterium has a "pumping" function for lymphatic and blood fluids. That by the way is the main reason why the mesenterium is now candidate for consideration as organ, as the detailed functionality of the mesenterium is suspected to be much more than just a transport medium but would have metabolic functions too. To compare this, the appendix, being a evolutionary residual organ has no apparent function. But there is ongoing research which analyses if the appendix has functions for the immune system. So this is quite a regular thing that now with the more accurate biochemical and microscopic means of these days we are able to find new functionality in already known organs or structures of the body.
Sources:
I think the Wikipedia articles about the mesenterium and peritoneum are pretty well and seriously written:
- Mesentery - Wikipedia
- Peritoneum - Wikipedia
- Sigmoid colon - Wikipedia shows where the sigmoid colon is located
- is a great view on the lower male abdomen
Now what about the mesenterium and erections?
The mesenterium is nowhere connected to any part of the reproductive system. So we definitely can exclude any sort of pumping function connected to the corpus spongiosum or corpus cavernosum of the male penis.
It well has a "pumping" function, but this "pumping" function can’t be compared to the pumping function and power the heart is able to deliver. The pressure levels required for getting an erection can only be delivered by the arterial blood pressure.
Therefore I am afraid to say that we have to exclude the mesenterium from being responsible in any way for erections.
But what about the massive expansion from 10cci to 32cci?
So you are having an erection factor of 3.2. My question is: have you measured before you started PE? The question sounds maybe surprising, but usually erection factor goes down by PE training. The reason is pretty simple: flaccid growth. The more you do PE, the more your penis develops from "grower" to "shower" because of ligaments being more stretched, CS and CC being permanently enlarged (we call it cemented gains :-) ) and, especially in case of long high-pressure pumping, quite a bit of fluid can be permanently stored wherever is space in the enlarged structures. In simple words: the flaccid penis gets heavy, thick and long. I suppose you can confirm the massive growth of the flaccid penis in your own case. Now I have, by chance, my initial measurements at hand. The measurements are bone-pressed length, mid-section girth, volume in cubic inches for flaccid and erect.
Pre-PE flaccid 6.10; 3.94; 7.53 erect 8.35; 5.51; 20.18 erection factor for volume: 2.68
By now: flaccid 6.54; 4.33; 9.75 erect 8.78; 5.87; 24.04 erection factor for volume 2.46
You see, my volume erection factor went down by 8.9% in a mere 3 years. This by no means should be interpreted that you have in any sort a kind of a small penis - erect or flaccid. It simply means that erection factor is probably not the base for a solid argumentation.
I would not be surprised if a erection factor of over 4 is possible - but that usually means a impressive grower starting at a quite low flaccid size.
But what about the development of base girth in the last ten years?
Well, that simply means you had found your appropriate training method. I suppose you did a lot of pumping, and as far as I remember you did some pretty extreme methods like clamped diving or clamping/wrapping for longer times with the namba. This, in my opinion, may explain the development of the base girth. Probably you did less constrictive methods before the last ten years. And I suppose that with a penis that massive, it is not only enlargement of the CS and CC that made you gain but fluid build-up too. As I did until now only see flaccid or manually clamped pictures of your penis, I guess your erections are not that hard as they were before. I don’t mean to attack you by saying that, but fluid build-up is a quite natural phenomenon if massive pumping is involved, so the mass of the penis becomes so big that the hydraulic capacity of CS and CC is no longer sufficient to maintain the penis completely erect.
OK, that basically what I can answer based on the sources I found and some knowledge I have.
I am very interested to read your answer soon
R65