P Shot Using PRF?

A clinic I visited for a consultation proposed using PRF instead of PRP for a P shot. Prf seems to contain more growth factors and stays in place longer for the effects to take place. It would also have a temporary filling effect while this was taking place for a temporary boost to size in the order of three weeks. Anyone think of any negatives?

Some info:

Safety and feasibility of platelet rich fibrin matrix injections for treatment of common urologic conditions - PMC

I’m familiar with PRF. It’s a lot more effective than PRP in cosmetic applications.

I wondered about doing it for the p-shot. I think it sounds like it would work better and may help those who felt PRP was ineffective.

Downside is that it’s not well studied, so it’s a gamble, but so is PRP and Stem Cells.

I think I’m going to give it a go. She’s a well reviewed and respected provider.

Can you say what state/city you’re getting it?

St George, UT

So da_dt have you generated the equation for the rate of change of your penis size resulting from PE activities? Or have I totally misunderstood your username?

You got it! Do you know the name of the function my user name expresses?

You are making me go way back in the memory banks. Best I can come up with is the change in area with time.

Change in acceleration with respect to time. It would result in a jolt or jerk and is hence named the jerk function.

If once I knew that, I have certainly now forgotten it. Calculus was a looooong time ago.