Girth vs. Diameter

Ok. You are wondering if the increase of tunica albuginea and corpora cavernosa gives a different feeling through intercourses than the increase of corpus spongiosum (the soft, ventral side of your penis). Since we don’t know how to specifically increase the firsts instead than the latter (corpus spongiosum), it is a waste of time thinking about it.

First you have no reason to spell wrong, You have spell checker Read your post carefully before you post it, benefical is beneficial :) No offense its forum rules.

Bro Just out of curiosity how old are you? Your questions are so weird :) , No offense. There is nothing balled Bottom and tom in girth my friend. Girth is girth, And you benefit from it, if it comes from down up side any, So what your focusing on this? When I start gaining I really didn’t care or even think if I will gain girth from up or down :D . About asking if there is beneficial!! I don’t know what to tell you Honestly, You gained .75 in girth, So you ask your self will you benefit from it ;) If not then give it to me, I add it to my gains :D

Sorry about spelling the word wrong. I chronically over think things so my bad. I have even gotten past 5 inches but it still pisses me off that the width wouldn’t grow. However, the width has finally started to really expand while clamped so maybe it will grow significantly now.

I hope you are mocking with this post because it is the most grammatically incorrect post I have ever come across. It is so bad I have no idea what you are trying to say.

You’re mixing diameter and width. You can’t increase girth without increasing diameter. What you’re talking about is increasing girth without increasing width (as seen from above) thanks to corpus spongiosum growth.

DIAMETER DOES NOT APPLY TO PENISes as they are NOT perfect circles.

What the OP is asking is whether the focal points of the more oblate, and more elliptical penis, are better when they are aranged vertically, or horizontally.

Oh man, yes, this thread is chicken or the egg situation…. lol

No need to go to such extremes. If you want to be so specific, it’s not an ellipse either, it’s an irregular shape. It’s easier to just look at it as a circle because if people confuse diameter and width, what will happen if we start using terms like focal point?

I guess we are going to have to start speaking parametricly… ;)

I don’t understand the diameter thing. When to a sex shop yesterday and saw a huge ass cockring which read 50mm. What would that be in terms of inches or centimeters?

Without seeing it, I am only guessing that the 50mm (roughly 2”) is the diameter, making the circumference (or girth) about 6.25“.

If it was 2“ circumference (the way we measure girth) then it would measure just over half an inch across, like the size of a finger ring.

I agree with the irregular shape comment. The shape is more of a rounded triagular shape with the corners and the flatness of the triangle are rounded, of course the corners are more rounded that the flat of the triangle.

For girth to be noticeable on that shape would take massive gains, but it happens.

Stop confusing yourselves ^^

If by diameter you mean circumference/pi and nothing else, then it ONLY applies to perfect circles/cylinders(/balls :D ) and you can forget about it here.
If however, you simply mean the distance from one side of an object to the other side from a certain point of view, then diameter=width.

Regarding the actual question here: Yes, it could make a difference if you gain girth by gaining width or by gaining depth/height.
Increasing the dimension that is already larger (mostly width I should guess) might stretch a vagina more noticeably and allowing for more friction.
Increasing the smaller dimension increases girth faster but stretches a vagina differently.

And no, I have no I Idea which one is better. Both should be beneficial and we can’t really choose one so I guess the question really is moot.

We re not confusing our selves. It is just our opinions as you have yours. These guy put some thought into this as you did.
I find all their opinions to be interesting, but you seem to have the answer.

So if you post “Stop confusing yourselves”, then you must have the answer and have scientific proof, Right? All of this was opinions and
your opinion is a very interesting one as well. Can you tell us more in detail, because I think you may be have something here, but so did others.

All those calculations on the first page were done under the assumption that the penis is perfectly cylindrical, which it is not for most people. Mine is rather wide and flat. I have a 5.1 girth, yet I have a 1.7 diameter, which is wider than it would be if it were cylindrical. I’m curious if women care about the penis being thicker in the horizontal direction or in the vertical direction.

I’m sorry if it sounded as if I had all the answers.
My point about diameter vs width was just logic.
What I meant with the confusing bit was that people were talking about the diameter as a purely theoretic number, that could be calculated but had no direct physical meaning.

About the width vs girth question: No, I have no proof. I just think it’s clear that it’s “different” if you stretch something only laterally or if you stretch it evenly in all directions.
I mean, they surely wouldn’t like something very flat and wide in there. Maybe someone with a willing, uh, “test object”, could find objects with the same circumference but different shapes and find out what feels best.