What is thick? What is long?

Jawbone,

Shouldn’t you be starting grades at a “B”? An above-average dick warrants an above-average grade, does it not?

You also have to keep in mind the person giving out the grades (i.e. the receiving vagina.)

For example, some vaginae will grade anything over 6” long as hitting her cervix and a “D” because ouch!

But I think all vaginae will grade a “nice girth” as anything over 5. All vaginae can open sideways enough to squeeze out baby heads. I would agree that 5.5” girth will be uniformly called big. 6” of girth is the whooper.

Gah, could someone edit this to “Am I the only one here who would like to derive a consensus on this based on percentiles?”, I think I really slipped up with my last post in general but that line in particular is bugging me and I can no longer edit it!

On a side note, is it not completely annoying when a twink ladyboy ends up having a huge cock?

I found this pic and would like to share it with the group to illustrate my point.

That ladyboy has my dream cock.

No porn links! ~

So long as you’re on that chart you’re considered to be within the realms of being a phallic god, as compared to other men here. So I disagree with grades starting at “B”… for that chart. But for mere mortals I’m sure it’s different.

As to the main point, I completely dodged the question, you’re right. I actually thought this was what *was* huge or large not what was considered huge or large. In terms of size with women two things that play into this I’m sure are comfort levels and experience. “What is big to me?” and “What have I seen before?”. Both of those I can’t answer but it would be really nice to have answered. Apparently my size is “scary” to my SO but I’m spot on average.

Aren’t baby heads like 14-15” of girth?

Invisible - What is thick? What is long?

Jawbone,

I like your chart. If your chart has four categories, five actually since average 50% is on there, shouldn’t each category have a range of 10%. Since you are starting average at 50th percentile and there are 5 remaining categories (50/5=10). Wouldn’t this mean that above average starts at 60%, big at 70%, huge at 80%, and abnormal at 90%. Not sure though if 90% should be called abnormal or monstrous. Comparing it to average male height, a man at 6’4" would be in the 90th percentile (at age 25). I don’t think I would call that abnormal or monstrous though.

Average height for men, height and weight chart

Yes, but this is because height simply doesn’t vary much, compared to cock volume. A guy with a really big dick can have four times (or more!) the cock volume of a guy with a really small dick. This is what I was getting at in my post about how cock size “categories” should take into consideration how noticeable size variations are, in addition to how rare they might be.

What is Short?

What is Thin?

Why am I still here?

That’s exactly what I did at first, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90%.. but something was clearly wrong at that scale because we know by simple deduction that 90% does not equal abnormally large or monstrous like you gathered. In perspective of your height example, it’s going to take more than 1 out of 10 people standing around for the likelihood of a abnormally large person to stand out in a crowd. Maybe 1 in 100 is more like it, and as para-goomba has said, height really doesn’t vary as much as cock volume, or even just length vs height. Another thing happens when you get to absolute average, in that there is a large portion around it that’s considered average as well, I believe it follows a bit of a bell curve. So as far as abnormal and above average goes, I decided to reevaluate what I had and to take scales provided by other people. 98% was considered to be A+, and seemed to be a bit more of a rarity 1/50 which seemed right (more on this later). The grade scale also had the first acceptable grade at 65% which corresponded with my 2nd deduction. The rest of the scale followed suit.

1/50 is abnormal?
Yes, it’s abnormal, especially (but not exclusively) when length and girth are combined with a correlation coefficient of 55%.. I think that brings us back up to a 1/100 people having an abnormally sized penis overall. abnormal Length is 8.35 BPEL, abnormal Girth is 6.25. I doubt those who have it will agree but it seems right the way it’s running through my mind as well.

Thanks for pointing me there. :)

You’ve been with 8 women if memory serves? In your mid 20s?

8 men at 25 would not a higher mileage gal make.

8 men this year would get her on the field. 8 men this month? Yup. 8 men this week? Now that would be an expert opinion! ;)

I believe what is thick and long is when a girl tells you so.

One of the main reasons I PE is so I can hear another girl tell me that, I find it a huge turn on! :D As shallow as it may seem, I don’t think I could ever stay with a girl that refused to comment about my dick, I just need the ego rub more than anything I suppose.

I am 27 and have been with 21 women in my life, my current girlfriend has been with ~18 guys which puts her about +10 higher than most of the women I have dealt with lol. Not saying she is or isn’t a dick expert but she has been with her fair share.

For length:

Over 7.25” is 9.16 % (If we refuse about 0.25”-0.35”(I think it is average incorrect measurement, in sitting about 0.35”) incorrect measurement method over 7.25” only 5.90% - 6 in 100 - very big - ). Over 8” BPEL only 1% (rare).

Over 7” 9.16 % * 9 in 100 (size is big) .

Over 6” (about 1” (like 7” BPEL) bigger than average NBPEL) NBPEL - BIG . Over 8”NBPEL very rare . I think 1 in 300.

/forum/poll.php … ults&pollid=296

For Girth :

With normal pressing meter (not weak pressing) (I refuse 0.2” for incorrect massurement)

Over 5.6” - 8.82% - 9 in 100 - BIG

Over 6”- 2.5 % - 3 in 100 (30 in 100 - bigger than 970 other man’s ) - very big

Over 6.4” - 1.1 % - 1 in 100 (111 in 10000 - bigger than 9889 other man’s ) - rare

Patience. PRE PE GIRTH

(Results were similar as in the Kinsey and LifeStyle )