Helluvastud,
Yeah, isn’t it amazing how there hasn’t been a single decent study conducted on penis size? That’s why we’re continually having these debates. I don’t expect perfection, by any means, but every single study I’ve seen has had multiple serious flaws.
Internet Studies:
-Skewed Sample (Internet only sample, and mostly guys searching on “penis.” Guy’s engaging in PE are far more likely than average to discover and participate in these studies, and above average guys, in general, are more likely to submit their sizes.
-Ambiguous Directions (I’ve never seen it CLEARLY, and unmistakably spelled out whether to BP or not)
-No standardized measuring equipment (Everyone uses whatever ruler they have handy, and for girth some use a tailor’s, tape, some use dental floes, inc.)
-Most studies don’t specify the degree of precision to measure to, or which way to round
-No way to verify that participants aren’t fudging their measurements
-No way to keep people from entering fake data in order to purposely ruin the study
-Many participants vote multiple times, because, believe it or not, some of these studies actually make you vote in order to check the current results, and make you vote again every time you want to re-check the numbers.
Physician (or other trained staff) Measured Studies:
-Weak erections (stressful environment not conducive to achieving maximum erection)
-Inadequate sample sizes
-Failure to fully disclose study methodology
-Skewed sample; especially in the case of using volunteer spring participants (The better endowed guys would more likely to participate)
-Intoxication effecting erection quality (again in the case of spring break studies)
One physician measured study did use chemically induced erections (injected directly into the penis or genital region) so he could measure quality erections. I think this was a step in the right direction. Unfortunately, he used a super small sample, and didn’t fully disclose his methodology.
Some organization needs to conduct a study using a large, RANDOM sample, physician measured study of chemically induced BP erections. They need to do everything in their power to unsure that an extremely high percentage of the participants selected at random actually participate so as not to get a disproportionate number of people confident in their size participating. This is usually done by offering holdouts increasingly higher amounts of money to participate until a sufficient percentage of those randomly selected report. I swear that none of the people doing any of the penis size studies I’ve seen have the faintest clue about how to conduct a high quality survey.