Bunch of Medical Studies regarding Penile Size

I know its a link, a link which might change content soon, but I didn’t know how to otherwise post all the information found in it.

http://www.ncbi .nlm.nih.gov/en … om_uid=15510185

Theres a whole slew of medical research regarding penis size some of it irrelevant but take a gander. Some examples a study into sizes between ED and normal patients, ultrasound volume measurement, erection size prediction based on flaccid, size loss after prostate surgery, averages of Jordanian, Korean, Turkish, Italian etc etc.

Nice link page, hope it stays up.

SiamGuy Very interesting!

Great find and interesting reading Siamguy.

What’s really interesting is when you look at the lengths they are talking about in terms I’m familiar with (i.e. inches)
In the first artical They don’t talk about erect lengths but if you look at the flaccid lengths, they are only 3 5/8 and stretched 5 1/4

In the second artical it’s even more significant.
Flaccid length mean 3 1/2
Stretched flaccid 4 15/16
Erect length 5 1/8

With stats like that is it any wonder that Jordanians need to dress their women in Burka’s and keep them from coming in contact with outside cultures. Just kidding:)

lol good one Monty.

Actually they are measuring in centimeters. I think the numbers are a little off even though I wish they were correct.

For instance, in article 1 (for the Jordanian men) the mean stretched length was 13.5 which translates into 5 1/4 inches.

In article 6 (for young Italian males) , the stretched length was 12.5 cm which is 4 7/8 inches.

I am neither Italian nor Jordanian but aren’t these numbers a little low. You mean to tell me Italian guys are hovering around the 5 inch mark?

Strethced lenght was 5 1/4 inches? Someting has to be wrong about that…

Nothing wrong with that so long as it’s realised thats nbp. For instance, concerning the Wessells doctor mentioned in the link, I’ve before looked into a penis size study he did. He was very clear in his chart showing flaccid stretch, erect size, and also showed depth of fat pads separate from the length measurements. He did a good clear job in analysis. He separated age groups and he showed that the fat pads overall were thicker for the older group, and that this explained the smaller measurements in flaccid stretch and erect, as when the fat pads were added to each group they were very close in overall size. Without hunting down my posts about him, I do recall the measurement up to the skin was in the low 5 inches and with the fat pads added to each age group it was in the low 6 inches.

http://www.ncbi .nlm.nih.gov/en … st_uids=8648808

Reading this study regarding growth hormone supplementation for patients with micropenis and congenital growth hormone deficiency. I’m not clear on whether or not the patients had to be supplemented during before puberty or if it works on adults and whether or not an overdosage in individuals with normal levels of growth hormone results in larger penises, hmmm.

Something popped into my head after seeing the penile length to shoe size study. Has there been any study into penis GIRTH correlation to a body part?

Wow, this is really, really cool info. Interesting how different doctors working on opposite sides of the globe have reached such similar (and surprisingly small) numbers. The only problem is that we (well, I don’t anyway) have access to the full texts, so it’s unclear whether they’re measuring bone pressed or not.