Can LIG potential be determined?

Do you think that hardgainers have more dense, thicker, stronger ligs? And on the same token do easygainers have less dense, weaker more pliable ligs?

If this being the case would the hard gainer have more length GROWING POTENTIAL due to the fact that there is more LIG TO BE STRETCHED compared to the less dense lig of a fast gainer? This is also assuming that ligs can only be stretched so much before gains are no longer capable of growth i.e. reaching a maximum length limit.

For example If we take 2 people both with a LOT of 9. The fast gainer would get lets say 1 1/2” then bottom out by changing his LOT from 9 to 6. Which then leads to having to switch to the tougher more awkward Tunica stretching for more gains.And on the opposite end the hardgainer might take 2 or 3 times as long to accomplish the same gains but still have more lig growing potential for maybe another 1 1/2”. And as another indicator maintaining a high LOT.

This might also lead you to believe if they both started at a length of 6 inches. The fastgainers maximum potential could be around 8 inches. While the hardgainers max could be around 10 inches.( these numbers are just for example) Again this is based on lig density.

Is there more long term benefits for the hardgainers as opposed to the quick gains of an easy gainer? Maybe there’s a bright side to being a hardgainer.

elite,

>Do you think that hardgainers have more dense, thicker, stronger ligs? And on the same token do easygainers have less dense, weaker more pliable ligs? <

Ligs and/or tunica. I do believe there is a huge variable in the strength of collagenous tissues.

>If this being the case would the hard gainer have more length GROWING POTENTIAL due to the fact that there is more LIG TO BE STRETCHED compared to the less dense lig of a fast gainer? This is also assuming that ligs can only be stretched so much before gains are no longer capable of growth i.e. reaching a maximum length limit.<

Maybe, or maybe not. If you are referring solely to ligs, then depending on the individual, they might be strong, tight and high, or strong, loose and low. Same variables for guys for weaker collagenous tissues.

>For example If we take 2 people both with a LOT of 9. The fast gainer would get lets say 1 1/2” then bottom out by changing his LOT from 9 to 6. Which then leads to having to switch to the tougher more awkward Tunica stretching for more gains.And on the opposite end the hardgainer might take 2 or 3 times as long to accomplish the same gains but still have more lig growing potential for maybe another 1 1/2”. And as another indicator maintaining a high LOT. <

The strength of the individual lig tissues will not determine the total amount that can be gained from lig stretch. Only the amount of ‘inner’ penis above the pubic bone could do this. You could have an X-ray done. Your unit will actually show up on the plate.

>This might also lead you to believe if they both started at a length of 6 inches. The fastgainers maximum potential could be around 8 inches. While the hardgainers max could be around 10 inches.( these numbers are just for example) Again this is based on lig density. <

I would not think so.

>Is there more long term benefits for the hardgainers as opposed to the quick gains of an easy gainer? Maybe there’s a bright side to being a hardgainer.<

You get to PE longer before reaching your goals.

Bigger

Thanks for the insight Bigger.

> You could have an X-ray done. Your unit will actually show up on the plate.

Wow. This is interesting.

Bib,

>You get to PE longer before reaching your goals. <

Joy.

:)
SS4

SS$,

I put that in there just for you.

Bigger