DMSO; Positive Results For Growth?

I read in different forums about DMSO and it’s effects on growth. Many people who do PE and used DMSO have seen growth. DMSO has been said to break down collagen, but the tradeoff is that it inhibits smooth cell proliferation.

I have also read that it helps break up plaque buildup when used along with iodine. It leads me to believe that it only benefits plastic deformation and not growing new cells via mitosis.

I am making this thread to get more feedback on DMSO on growth from people that have used it before. The people here that have used it left Thunders. For those who have used it, what are your results whether good or bad?

I’m interested to hear about this as well, and I think I read somewhere that DMSO can lighten skin that was darkened by long term NPE. Point being, I’ll be lurking on this thread as well.

FK

I did and can’t assure any noticeable positive changes. Back then I used pure DMSO which was a mistake, too strong for the skin. And it stinks.

PVPI was present on the blend, an iodine variable.

Haven’t played with it since. This was 3 years ago, here is the link from back then: Lenny - Lenny’s Thread

If you want to give a try, I wouldn’t recommend the 100% DMSO.

How about you first say WTF “DMSO” is?

I was able to double the volume of my unit with XTLMC.

Did you mean 100% in concentration or purity? I have 70% in concentration because any more than that irritates the skin. It needs something to be diluted with. There wasn’t any added stretchiness’ to your shaft? Some people commented that daily use would make their penis more malleable, but the con is that it could cause garlic breath which usually implies too much has went in your system and you need to back off. If you stop using for a number of days, your penis will go back to being tougher.

I wrote what DMSO does. If you want the scientific name for it, Google it. The complete name is irrelevant. Now we can argue that I didn’t put in my OP that it is a solvent, then your comment would be rational. I highly doubt that is what you were suggesting.

I highly doubt that you will find any success stories. I certainly tried spending some days looking for.

Although the outest skin layer is the hardest to penetrate and deeper layers should be easier to cope, it takes up to 15 minutes according to some studies for DMSO to penetrate into dermis.
At that point the substance should be washed out and drained into systemic bloodstream in high probability never reaching deeper tissues.
Unless you keep the apply continuous, which would lead quickly to excessive concentration in the bloodstream making you taste it in your mouth.
Or you utilize phonophoresis with ultrasound application. That has been seen delivering DMSO topically into muscular tissue beneath without a doubt.

Are they making their dermal tissues malleable only is the question?

Another thing is the mechanics of the DMSO inducing any growth in general remains very questionable as well.

Skin treatment at least, anything else not so sure if it is only wishful thinking with placebo responders.

It would be easy to turn look otherway but I can´t. I feel the need to shoot down bad science when ever I see one. DMSO and PE marriage is one of the issues.

The concentration needed for DMSO to weaken the collagen in normal healthy connectve tissue can´t be produced on living tissue.

“The amount of the other types of collagen, especially the insoluble fibrous collagen, was unchanged. As the firmness of collagen treated with DMSO decreased, we concluded that the intermolecular bonds had been changed. Therefore, we examined the tensile strength of rat-tail tendons before and after 24 hr treatment with DMSO in increasing concentrations in Ringer solution adjusted to a pH of 7.2 (FIGURE 1). It is not until a concentration of 95% DMSO is used that the tensile strength suddenly decreases. The circles show the expansion of the tendons by the pull of a weight of 100 gm, while the crowes indicate the expansion when 10 gm are applied. This sudden increase in extensibility is coupled with a shortening, a swelling, and an increase in translucency and elasticity. Collagen, being a linear polymer, can only react this way when its intermolecular bonds are broken.2 Such effects are also seen after application of other chemicals and higher temperature. As interesting as this question regarding the mode of action of DMSO may be, in living tissue, we can not obtain high enough concentrations of DMSO to alter the tensile strength of collagen in the fashion just outlined. In vivo, other modes of action must apply. Therefore, the question was of interest whether or not other physical changes of collagen exist that can be demonstrated after treatment of animals in vivo; or whether the decrease of collagen under the influence of DMSO, as seen in postirradiation subcutaneous fibrosis is caused, not by a direct effect on collagen, but, rather, by a change in the equilibrium between synthesis and degradation of collagen.”

So because there is no weakening of the collagen, could it possibly alter the metabolism of the normal healthy collagen tissue.

“The investigations using various test methods have shown that treatment of animals with DMSO causes alteration of the collagen fibres. After treatment, they swell in weak acids more rapidly by splitting of the intermolecular cross linkages of collagen fibres. Synthesis and catabolism of collagen decrease simultaneously during DMSO treatment. Therefore, there will be no significant change in the amount of insoluble collagen of skin. In contrast, as we could prove in our earlier investigations, DMSO excerts a significant effect on pathologically increased collagen in human postirradiation subcutaneous plaques,' but does not appear to change the equilibrium of the metabolism of collagen of normal tissue. Under the influence of DMSO, synthesis of mucopolysaccharides is decreased as well. Nevertheless, their amount in skin grows, following a more retarded breakdown. The effect of DMSO on the synthesis of collagen and mucopolysaccharides is comparable to the action of antiphlgistics. Total degradation of collagen is decreased during treatment with DMSO in humans. This is an effect similar to the one seen during application of cortisol.”

Apparently not.

https://nyaspub s.onlinelibrary … .1967.tb34932.x

In terms of how it affected skin, I have been told it helps discoloration, makes the skin softer, and increases vein size. It’s probably from the blood circulation benefits that it’s claimed to have. A few people have stated they put a few drop into the urethra which seemed pretty extreme to me.

There are plentty of positives to take with the skin treatment, and the urethral apply is not so radical after all if the solution is not too strong, as vasodilation medications has been applied that way for long time already.

I have been considering using this for a while but I am on the fence because research has stated it inhibits smooth muscle growth. If I am not mistaken the tunica has smooth muscle on the inside. If the growth is inhibited, the best way to grow would be plastic deformation via pumping. I am not sure if stretching the smooth muscle out until it stays that way without cells growing will make it larger. At least not permanently.

Was 100% DMSO.