Flaccid Hang vs Erect Girth

Ok, that last picture looked like shit.

And thanks for the input BigJohn. Your data actually made it even more correalative. CD now is 90.25% for a linear relationship between EG and FL, independent of Erect Length!

Well since I havent started yet, all pre-pe

Eg- 6.25 - 6.5
Fh - 4
EL - 5.75

I wonder what it will be like with EL.

lolop,

Damn nice girth, and it’s even better with that length!

Please disregard my last post. Excel was dorting stuff wrong on me and it got all screwed up.

Nothing conclusive so far.

Does anyone know if it’d be possible to correlate FL, EG, and EL at once? I never got past 1 year of statistics.

Zurn,

If you can get rid of that fat pad, you’d have some gain!! I realize that a lot of my gain—almost three inches BPEL since October came with hard PE work, but also from a 20 pound weight loss. I dropped from 194 to 174 pounds and my fat pad (that I wasn’t even aware of) disappeared!! Good luck with your PE program.

Horsehung

Kog,

You asked me what my erect girth was. I thought I had posted it: With a full, hard erection, 71/4” at the base, 6” midway, and 5 1/2” at the head.

Horse

yeah, i looked at the graph.

the x-axis numbers are all jacked up……dont see a correlation yet, just a slight trend.

Yeah, like I said they were sorted wrong and excel is picky about the way you have them laid out. I’ll tool around with it tomorrow, but right now my brain hurts. Turns out length will need to be taken into account, just gotta figure out how. Then we’ll see how it goes.

Eg 5 inches
FH 4 inches
EL 6.5 inches

exactly.

Insane Man, save graphs like that as a gif or png. Either that or use less jpg compression.

Flacid length: 4.5”
Erect length: 6.75”
Flacid girth: 4.50”
Erect girth: 5.00”

All are BP. Well, except girth.

Yeah the first one looked like shit.

FL 4.5

BPEL 7

FG 4

Eg 5.95

BPEL: 8.0”

EG: 6.25”

FL: 5.75”