I has a theory

Just from reading a few people’s stats and conceptualizing, it seems like whichever of your wiener’s dimensions (length or girth) is salient, that’s the one that is going to be easier to gain more of. For example, say you are 7.75” by 4.75”—you have a long and relatively skinny wiener, or a high length to girth ratio—it is more difficult for you to gain girth than length. This is unfortunate, because what you need is girth. And if you have a chode that is in need of length, you will unfortunately be more more adept at gaining girth than your much-needed length.

I haven’t looked at any numbers on this, just a few I’ve noticed in people’s signatures. So if anyone with a disproportionately long and thin or short and fat wang can chime in and share their experiences, that would be helpful. And if anyone has been enterprising enough to compile the PE Database’s numbers into some useful format that could look for people with wangs that have either a really high ratio (like 8 to 5), or a really low ratio (like 1:1) and see how their gains have been, that would easily show us whether there is anything to my theory.

I kind of disagree. Anyone is capable of gaining easily both in the length and girth department depending on the exercises, consistency and the strength of ligaments etc.

I don’t know about that Okish6er. My concept is that there are three different layers of tunica fibers — ones that are longitudinally oriented thereby having their strength along axis parallel to the length of the penis, ones that are oriented ring-like for strength in the perpendicular direction (radial), and then a third layer of weaved fibers that achieve strength in both directions.

I imagine that someone could easily have greater strength in one of these layers than another and, thus, be a harder gainer in one direction than the other.

I hope I’m wrong though and that I’ll start getting girth any time now.

What about proportionally large penises (I.e. Big in both) or proportionally small penises?

For me, the theory holds. I was close to 6” girth when I started PE. NBP Length was also 6”. I’ve managed to increase my girth up to 6.4”. I’ve had negligable length gains. It’s annoying as hell cause what I really want is length. Does anyone have any suggestions for gaining length with an already thick penis? There must be something I’ve been doing wrong. I’ve tried jelqing for length, manual stretching in different directions with no results. If anyone is in a similar situation I’d be interested to hear what you have to say.

I believe LaPlace’s law suggests that higher volume recions of a tube will expand more quickly than smaller areas-maybe that’s a simplified expanation of why girthy guys gain girth more easily. That wouldn’t explain length issues, which are typically ligamentous more than tunica gains, at least for most.

If my memory of the physics of this is wrong, please feel free to correct it!

TD

I think that one reason for this might be that many people tend to focus on length or girth, thus whilst gaining in one or the other it seems to ruin the symmetry of a normal penis. Many also go for length only in the belief that doing girth work hinders length gains, which would explain very long penises with average girth. Stick that theory up your arse, and go do some penis enlargement.

This seems to be true for me. I started with 5.5x5 (NBPEL/EG) and it seems I gain girth easier than length. When I’ve tried girth work it has responded very well, but I’m working on length first so I’ve gained more length but it seems to be harder to get length gains.

Maybe you should start a poll or something. :)

He may have a valid point. That is why their are exercises primarily for girth and primarily for length. I think thick people should jelq only because it primarily adds length and little girth. Or do ULi’s for girth while it adds little to length.

My dick grows in a pretty constant ratio 0.2 in length to 0.1 in girth usually. And I have a good deal of length and girth.

Don’t mean to cut in front of you, checkoutmywang, but I’ve written about this here earlier, quite some time ago. But, yes, I’d agree with you (er, actually, you’re agreeing with me). :)

When young, I was 6.5 x 5.25 (stronger in girth, than length). By age 37, after some struggles with mild E.D., I was only 6.12 x 5.2 (again, I lost more length than girth).

When I began PE at that time, I gained 1/2” EG during my 1st month. WTF?! I was looking for length. And when I read about the quick length gains of guys who were better in the length department (as opposed to girth), this added to my frustration.