PE community

I would be willing to name you a few if you just answered like that:

Reunite other forums? Yeah, why not we could try to invite them here or at least discuss and deal with them about it…

If that was the case I would post them here in this forum.

If not I do not see the reason why I should do that.

If you are interested personally I could email you what I have been to know about.

Largosomalia,
You supposedly “do not like playing with words” and then proceed to spout some equation which just does not hold up to scrutiny. To quote you directly;

“For the whole (sum of members) the limit stands to its potential in respect to the maximum theoretical potential that can be, so in a study with a point of reference like this ,in practice you could say that the unit with the minimum limit is the total sum unit which referentically would be the unit with no limit at all (the unit that touches the lowest (quantitatively ) edge of the limit scale)”

I have read and re-read this passage and quite frankly can not make either heads or tails of it. What you are saying is Sigma (members) = lim P(x), x -> max; 0 < x < max; P(x) == 1 / x. Q.E.D., Sigma (members) -> 0.

Largosomalia, either you comprehend the above equation or you do not. Don’t waste our time “playing with words” of which you have no understanding. Don’t throw down statistics or statistical mechanics on this board unless you have an advanced degree in the field. I’m the Stephen Hawking of PE compared to you. You could learn a lot by just listening to others.

So please, either shut-up and contribute to PE, or lurk and don’t bother anyone.

-sexpilot

Or to quote Jimi Hendrix “Knowledge speaks, wisdom listens”.

Honestly I do not care who you are compared to me.If you can conveice me with your arguments its excellent but telling me who you are or who I am doesn’t serve nothing.

Excuse me, but internet to me works like that.

Second regarding statistics I think that it’s much more complicated the formulaes you are going to use and depends on the case you are studying. I do not want to go very analitical with this because it won’t serve a lot.

That’s why I tried a more literary approach.

I can understand that my english propably is sloppy and I wish I could have done better so if there are any matters about this I would be happy to retry explain my words.

Why don’t we all just agree to disagree.

This thread is giving me a head complaint.

I have to disagree with largo here anyway. By putting everything into one big forum you stifle freedom. No matter how you phrase it largo by reducing the choices you reduce freedom of choice. If you reduce the choices to 1 then you have eliminated freedom of choice.

nb do not answer this by saying that in one big forum you have unlimited choice or something equally inane.

Also what happens if someone hacks into this big forum and crashes or destroys it - everything is lost and there is no way to comunicate due to the fact that not many of us here use our real names and don’t want to give out our work email address for instance.

This arguement is going round in circles and does nothing to further our cause.

So to finish with guys - Just leave it, it ain’t worth it.

sounds like you are an “idea” man.

I propose you go out there and make your dream a reality. But don’t expect everybody who already has a forum to just up and say “This largo guy is the messiah - wish he were here from the beginning”. Good luck with it.

Largo, to do something like you’re proposing, it would require:

more people — for any kind of remotely conclusive analysis we would need hundreds or thousands of new people so that we could have as few variables as possible when testing what works and what doesn’t.

money — it would require a lot of money and time to move all of our data, members, software, etc. etc to one bigger site. And the study itself would probably need to be funded too.

It’s a bad idea for all the reasons the guys listed above: no redundancy, stifling freedom, lack of “specialization”, and so on.

Also, it would be flawed from the beginning since everything here is self-reported, which, whether we like it or not, causes inconsistancies in measurements and time spent and allows dishonesty.

Bottom line: No one here is interested in carrying out your dream.

But thanks for sharing. :)

Unfortunately I am not messiah and I have never meet one of them.

I believe every social task to succeed needs common work,needs colaboration, needs grouping. I couldnt do much for everybody alone but together we could accomplish many big.

I posted here to see if there were people that could have thought what I have thought and if so try to discuss ideas on how we could proceed and do it.

I am not an expert on this but I would like to help achieve this task.

You said that it needs lots of money, lots of people etch., etch.

So if there could be some similar hypothetical curiosity about the establishment of an achievement like this I would also ask:

why do not we try to create an introductive essay about it and present it to other forums and see also other peoples opinions about it.Why do not we try to estimate how many people on the net are “clients” of PE and then try to figure out how big a server would be needed and with how much stuff to run it.etch, etch.Then tell the doctor community ask them their help.

So if we have positive responses ask them to begin a research study and provide them the data that they will need.

Then we could think so also of ways of funding the whole project.

Maybe donations, maybe ask a scientific research funding from some organization. European Community offers some programs that fund scientific researches. So maybe the doctors could ask.

I wish I were more expert and wiser but I am not but I am willing to use what I have about it.

Hey it wasn’t so difficult after all for me to think these above stupid ideas.

Maybe one has some done some ideas too to provide or some more expert can give more serious enlightment to a matter of the project.

We spread words to quote about it that could equally have been spent more productivelly like this.

We are not obligated to do nothing.This is just an idea.But if we like we can think about it and discuss it.

So if you could quote on the propositions I made above do it.

Largo,

You don’t give up, do you…… and you have become very tiresome.

How important do you think penis enlargement is? The reality is that a man with a 3” penis can still perform the job of procreation.

And here you are suggesting that we use valuable medical, scientific and research resources simply to boulster mens egos. Largo, IMHO, you are a selfish, naïve fool. These resources, quite rightly, should be chanelled into areas that really matter - cancer research, AIDS, immunology … the list goes on and on. Penis enlagement comes way, way, way down the list of priorities … and rightly so too!

Get a little perspective on your priorities and try to look past your penis and see the bigger picture. If you want to do some good in the world, campaign against war, raise money for cancer research or support a third world child. But please, enough of this foolish and selfish talk!

lil1 :flame:

largos;

I said yesterday that I was bowing out of this discussion, but….

In spite of much negative response to your idea, you persist and spend a great deal of time writing rebuttal which takes us a great deal of time to read. We are, by and large, supportive and thoughtful people here, (one of my definitions of Community), but you are now taking advantage of us and in the long run that will not benefit you.

Leave this untenable idea and move on to getting a bigger dick if that is indeed what you want. Your carrying on is beginning to look to me like major BS, which means bull shit.