Penis Size: The True Average

I agree.

Amen dude,amen

Too true

And then there are pricks like me that actually encourage them to break out the ruler and then subtly guide their hands to measure along the side of my cock and not on top, thereby picking up at least an inch.

And since it was they that measured it, they are well and truly convinced.

And since they ‘know’ that it’s ‘big’ because they measured it?

They go batshit crazy for it.

:)

Sounds like a win - win to me.

I like the way you think.

Me too!
It works fellas.

Best is to play it off like you don’t know the size— let them bring it up

They will.

When I was PEing regularly and just shy of 8 BPEL, one lady friend measure me at over 9”— the convo started when she commented that a dildo we had played with was too big for her ass— and when I mentioned that I was bigger she shook her head in disbelief, compared it and realized that I dwarfed it in girth. [Then she compared it to her wrist and freaked a bit]

Then the length convo started— I plead ignorance and let her pick up that ball and run with it.

Neat trick, huh?

Another study that may not have been mentioned looking at relationship between shoe size and dick length:

"The mean (range) age of the 104 men was 54 (17–84) years; the age distribution was biphasic, with peaks in the fourth and eighth decades (Fig. 1a). The median
(range) stretched penile length was 13 (6–18) cm and the UK shoe size 9 (5.5–13) (Fig. 1b). The linear regression statistic between the stretched penile length and shoe size gave an r2 of 0.012 (P=0.28) (Fig. 2), suggesting no statisticallysignificant relationship between stretched penile length and shoe size."

http://onlineli brary.wiley.com … 002.02974.x/pdf

I found these surveys but average penis lenght here is higher than all the other surveys. Does anyone know what is the method of measurement ( NBPEL or BPEL)?

Coxon (1996)a
Sample 1 Self report measuring strips Gay men (N D 420) 15.9 cm
Sample 2 Verbal self report Gay men (N D 118) 16.6 cm

Smith, Jolley, Hocking, Benton, & Georfi (1998)
Self report measurement strip 60% heterosexual
(N D 194) 15.7 cm

Richters et al. (1995) Self-report measuring strip 97% Caucasian
(N D 156) 16.0 cm

Smith AM, Jolly D, Hocking J, Benton K, Gerofi J. Does penis size influence condom slippage and breakage? 184 Heterosexual 60% 15.71 cm 13.2 (base)

Bogaert & Hershberger (1999)
Sample 1 Self-measurement report Heterosexual
(N D 3417) 15.6 cm
Sample 2 Homosexual
(N D 813) 16.4 cm - For the last one I know that they have used the Kinsey Institute data but in 1948 Kinsey determined that the mean length of an erect penis was 15,6 cm.

:D Well.. I know why :)

Does “self-report” say something to you ? :)

Exactly :D

If you would really like to see what most guys dicks look like then go to xhamster.com and click on the men section, some have larger than average some have smaller but most look to be around the same. *Warning* you will see a lot of gay porn.

surprised no one posted. this. Also, notice the very small average size.

http://www.natu re.com/aja/jour … aja201175a.html
The second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) has been proposed as a putative biomarker for prenatal testosterone and covaries with the sensitivity of the androgen receptor (AR). Both prenatal testosterone and the AR play a central role in penile growth. In this study, we investigated the relationship between digit ratio and penile length. Korean men who were hospitalized for urological surgery at a single tertiary academic centre were examined in this study, and 144 men aged 20 years or older who gave informed consent were prospectively enrolled. Right-hand second- and fourth-digit lengths were measured by a single investigator prior to measurement of penile length. Under anaesthesia, flaccid and stretched penile lengths were measured by another investigator who did not measure nor have any the information regarding the digit lengths. Univariate and multivariate analysis using linear regression models showed that only height was a significant predictive factor for flaccid penile length (univariate analysis: r=0.185, P=0.026; multivariate analysis: r=0.172, P=0.038) and that only digit ratio was a significant predictive factor for stretched penile length (univariate analysis:r=−0.216, P=0.009; multivariate analysis: r=−0.201, P=0.024; stretched penile length=−9.201×digit ratio + 20.577). Based on this evidence, we suggest that the digit ratio can predict adult penile size and that the effects of prenatal testosterone may in part explain the differences in adult penile length.

If one has a son, say a young son, how would they know if there was a lot of prenatal testosterone in the mother who gave birth to said son?

Is it something like if she was very athletic and in good athletic shape when she the mom conceived?

Is it the amount of test in the guy who’s sperm impregnated said woman?

I’m puzzled by what determinants would give a woman more prenatal testosterone.

I’m not totally sure, but it’s partly, probably largely, genetic. Most things like that are. A woman who’s tall, lean, hairy, and has small breasts is more likely to have high T.