Originally Posted by Lampwick
My guess would be that the way the volume is distributed makes a difference, but that’s just a guess.My hypothesis is that once you have enough length to penetrate deeper, less girth at the tip would be preferable to navigate the more complex deeper internal structures. A blunter (larger girth) tip would tend to bludgeon rather than being able to penetrate deeper, I would think. But again, that’s just my guess.
I can’t say one way or the other.. I can only give you my experience. I’m beyond baseball bat - a Mushroom as the name implies, though my hard work on girth the past few years have reduced it a bit.
I’m 5.5” mid, 6.25” at the glans, 5.25” base. Been with my wife for almost 30 years. Since the beginning she could not take in-and-out action. She had to slowly take me all the way in (missionary) wrap her legs around mine and grind herself into me until she cums. This still has not changed much.
I was 6.25” BPEL back then, 7.75+” now. The grind method is still about the same but she does incorporate a bit more in/out during the grind now. BUT we manage to keep her clit against my body (pubic bone?) by changing the angle during the in/out rather than just pumping in/out.
So I’d say one is not better than the other, but that each have their different advantages and techniques.