Addendum
It would seem that, despite my best intentions, some parts of the document are ambiguous and are not being taken in context with what has been stated elsewhere in the document, especially on the question of “Are gains permanent?” So, I have made some minor edits and reformatted it to clarify it further so that it is less open to interpretation and incorrect conclusions. It doesn’t add anything new, the added parts are only a reiteration of concepts and findings explained elsewhere in the document. Hopefully it will help clarify things.
Are gains permanent?
Yes, they can be, but are dependent on a number of factors.
Permanent growth (i.e. Compound Growth - long term growth that requires little or no maintenance) can really only be achieved by increasing the actual physical mass of the penis on a cellular level - more cells = larger penis.
Secondary Growth (i.e. training the penis to increase its capacity to hold more blood when erect) will require maintenance to retain gains and when maintenance ceases, many will see gains subside. How long this takes varies significantly on an individual basis - some will see the gains disappear fairly quickly while others may retain them for several years.
It should also be noted that there is no strict delineation between Primary Growth and Secondary Growth; and between Secondary Growth and Compound Growth - they can, and do, overlap. This explains why some people, whose regimens target Secondary Growth, still retain some gains after extended periods of inactivity - these gains are the effect of residual Compound Growth. Similarly, those who concentrate on Compound Growth may also experience some losses over time which can be attributed to the subsidence of Secondary Growth and short term retraction of scar tissue.
Additionally, there is little data available on what happens to penis size during the ageing process. It may naturally contract or distend - we simply don't know.
A further explanation and recap.
The use of the word “permanent” can be semantically problematic. For example, if you were killed in a car accident tomorrow, your PE gains would have been “permanent” for you! So, in the context of this discussion, “Permanent gains” should be read as, “long term growth that requires little or no maintenance”.
As outlined in the document, all gains can consist of several different kinds of growth. Primary Growth, Secondary Growth and Compound Growth can, and do, coexist. For example, Secondary Growth can also include a percentage of Primary Growth. Similarly, Compound Growth usually also consists of a percentage of both Primary and Secondary Growth. The big difference between these different types of growth is their “permanence”.
Both Primary and Secondary Growth are not “permanent” and, without regular maintenance, will disappear over time. However, Compound Growth (i.e. growth that is neither Primary nor Secondary and remains after they have disappeared) is “long term growth that requires little or no maintenance”.
Compound Growth can also be expressed as a percentage. For instance, in my case, after 6.5 years of complete PE inactivity, I have lost about 25% of my total gains. This would indicate that 25% of my overall gains consisted of a mixture of both Primary and Secondary Growth. The remaining 75% is Compound Growth - long term growth that requires little or no maintenance. Similarly, others have reported losses of around to 50% after stopping all PE for an extended period which would seem indicate that, at present, their gains consist of 50% Compound Growth and 50% Primary and Secondary Growth which have since disappeared. Then there are also those who have lost 100% of their growth which would indicate that all their gains consisted of Primary and Secondary Growth only.
It should also be noted that some methods appear to be better than others in promoting Compound Growth. (See Are some methods better than others for gaining?)
In conclusion, it appears that if you want to keep as close to 100% of your gains as you can, you will need a regular maintenance routine. At present, there is no way of detecting how much of an individual's gains is made up of Compound Growth until they've experienced losses over time. Some men (such as Bib), will be very lucky in having both the physical propensity and the foresight to have used an appropriate regimen to best exploit Compound Growth - they will require very little or no maintenance to retain their gains in the long term. At the other end of the scale, others who, for whatever reason, were unable to achieve Compound Growth, will need a regular maintenance routine to keep any of their gains.
I hope this clarifies the point a little better.
Now, I have an impatient horse and a sunset that beckons!
Adios Amigos!
lil1 :lep: