Sizes consensus

Sorry to burst your bubble I am with the larger group of what is listed above and I still stand by what I seen as reasonable in the first post. I don’t know what type of women you are dealing with in Brazil but from my experience most of them are to tight to enjoy anything close to what you are claiming. Been to Rio a few times ;-) and I am referring to the street hookers that do this day in and day out to eat some being stretched out by three children and such. 6.5” is most likely to much for a normal woman to withstand and if you think you are getting that in her ass without discomfort or bleeding you are kidding yourself. What you think is average is starting to enter the 1%-5% percentile of men. Not that many are walking around with 6+ inches. My base is 6.25, mid shaft 6-6.1 and upper shaft 5.7-5.9 and this has caused enough eyes to roll in the back of the females head for me to realize it is enough or more than enough but like yourself I am trying for more but not to the point where I start being denied anal sex because of my self motivation

I love your ranges, because it means I’m big now and was above average when i started.

I agree. I think the very thing that makes us do PE, makes us raise the scale to see ourselves as too small.At least, for a large number of us. I started off as bigger than average and I’ve always thought I was too small. I could probably sport 11” and think the same. Well, maybe not then.

Here is my shot at what I think is a reasonable size consensus. I have chosen to take a “percentile” approach mixed with a normal distribution curve. I have done this as I think it more accurately reflects a woman’s thoughts on the unit. In other words, when she thinks “Wow, that is the biggest I have seen and I have had 10 partners, or 20 or 30.” etc. Here is my percentile breakdown. I will also be using BPEL as firstly it is a standardized measurement, but also because it reflects what the woman will feel, and not just what she will see. Oh, and for the record for those who wish to have it clarified, a percentile in this case is a reflection of the population you are bigger than. So a 50th percentile would essentially be exactly average, as you would be bigger than 50 out of 100 men in the room, or half.

Here is my percentile breakdown which I pulled out of thin air:) :

Small - < 10th percentile
Below Average - 10th to 35th percentile
Average - 35th to 65th percentile
Above Average - 65th to 90th percentile
Big - 90th to 99 percentile
Wow - > 99th percentile

That is MY interpretation for how the sizes should be interpreted. I then used the stats from participants in my penis size survey (linked to in my signature) to determine the corresponding percentiles. My survey contains the Pre-PE sizes of at the moment, 102 participants.

BPEL Sizes

Small -< 5.47”
Below Average - 5.47” - 6.16”
Average - 6.16” - 6.77”
Above Average - 6.77” - 7.46”
Big - 7.46” - 8.27”
Wow - > 8.27”

Erect Girth

Small - < 4.35”
Below Average - 4.35” - 4.80”
Average - 4.80” - 5.20”
Above Average - 5.20” - 5.64”
Big - 5.64” - 6.15”
Wow - > 6.15”

If you disagree with the associated percentiles in inches, then PLEASE participate in my study. Again, it is linked to in my signature, and I GREATLY appreciate you for participating. All I ask is that you use your Pre PE or “natural” size. Also, please do your best not to exaggerate but instead use your true size. On this forum, you are known only as a screen name, and nobody really cares what size you are. All everyone wants in this forum is to share the journey that is PE. To learn together, and create a friendly and helpful community. Thanks again. I’ll see you around the forum.

Gimli

Even this seems reasonable but when you start saying 6.5-7.5 is ONLY above average I think that is getting a little carried away. Voce quer uma vaca para foder

:rolling: :rolling: :rolling: :thumbs:

I’d put the categories something like this, as far as women’s likely psychological reactions go…

Length (NBP)
Small: < 4”
Below average: 4-4.5”
Average: 4.5-5.75”
Above average: 5.75-6.75”
Big/large: 6.75-7.5”
Wow: > 7.5”

Girth
Small: < 4.4”
Below average: 4.4-4.7”
Average: 4.7-5.0”
Above average: 5.0-5.3”
Big/large: 5.3-5.8”
Wow: > 5.8”

Source: my anus.

Don’t worry about my bubble, it’s fine. You stand by what you stand by, I’ll do likewise.
I’ve “dealt” with women in Brazil, Argentina, USA, and Europe. When I wear a cock ring I go to 6.5, and guess what, it is what begins to stretch the women I deal with. Yes, there have been some tighter ones which couldn’t take the cock ring and some who were still loose with it on, but overall what I said is correct.
And I’m talking about regular women in their teens and twenties, not even prostitutes or women who’ve given birth.

I realize the percentiles but as far as my definitions go they don't matter, like I’ve said before, I based my assertions on the relation of penis size to women’s ability to take it in comfortably and with pleasure.

I’ve been 6 inches thick ever since I was 18, which covers the last 20 women I’ve slept with. I think two or three felt it was extremely tight, the rest were reasonably tight or average. Two were loose.

Whether or not that fits your reality is your concern alone, but I have both a penis which allows me a more accurate experience of what might go beyond a woman’s limit and plenty of experience using it, so I can speak on the subject with what I believe is a measure of authority.

I’ve never been denied anal. Convincing a woman to take it up the ass is an art. Fucking her ass is an art apart, I suppose I’m good enough in both. If that doesn’t match your reality, you should polish those skills and try again before disputing another person’s de facto experience.

Peace

You gay or just kidding?

I agree,

Good work Gimli

This I find very hard to believe (having possessed a 6” girth since I began sexing women, as well). In addition, don’t you think it’s worth mentioning that with a 6” girth, though most women will have no trouble accomodating and enjoying it vaginally, substantial amounts of foreplay — and “recovery periods” between sex sessions — are required for many women? I think that going up to 6.5” girth is pretty foolish unless a guy is exclusively interested in extended sex sessions — doesn’t care about potentially having to forego all quickies (not to mention decent blow-jobs, which have been pretty much impossible even with a 6” girth) with a future mate.

Heteros and homos alike can pull numbers out of their asses. :)

I agree with you as well, but I really like my percentile breakdown, and my survey was the only data I had that I could relate it too. Alas….if only I had more people fill out my survey with un-exaggerated results. Then perhaps it would be a much better reflection :( .

*the preceding was a shameless plug to get more people to fill out my survey in case you didn’t pick up on it*

Gimli

The thing about my girth and anal sex is very easy to explain: the head of my penis is considerably smaller. You can verify that on the thread The newly arrived 8
The shape makes it so anal sex is a lot simpler. I suspect that were I to have a proportional head or even a mushroom head, anal sex would be a bitch to get.

On the other hand, I seldom have problems with women becoming sore. Blowjobs are also doable for me because of the size of my glans. I get them just fine, though deep-throating is damn near impossible.

Foreplay? Screw that, I got two letters for you my friend: Kay, Why.

Hugs

I actually think this is the more accurate list. Because I’m on the wow side on both accounts!
Your anus is very informative Para Gumba. Hehehehe!

If you read my post you will see I also have one that can do the same so your argument is? A measure of authority, aren’t you the same one that was measuring lymph fluid a month or so ago?

Neither have I. Yes it is an art and it isn’t that hard to do so don’t give yourself too much credit. With 6.5” EG on a virgin ass you can forget it and that is a reality I don’t care how much you’ve “honed” your skills. I guess you are also the same “measurable authority” who will tell me I need to polish my skills based on my realistic responses.

Thanks KP, and thanks for the informative response El Wino.

One thing worth noting is that length will affect perceptions of girth, and vice versa. I started out with a 7x6” dick (NBP), and women always thought it was extremely thick, but rarely seemed to think much of its length. I think this reflects two things: first, that women notice and care about girth variations a lot more than about length variations (such that only extremes in length are really noticed much); and second, that thickness makes a dick look shorter, thinness longer. So a 5.5x6” dick may be perceived as super-thick but quite short, while a 5.5x4” dick may be perceived as super-skinny but quite long.