The truth about girth - 2015 Study

Taking measurements of erect girth from multiple studies, a sample of males ( n= 381) was used to develop an accurate mean and standard deviation for Erect Girth.

Results:

mean = 4.59"
SD = .433"

http://onlineli brary.wiley.com … 4DD4CF4F.f01t02

What does this mean?

5" is more girth than 83% of men (+1 SD)

5.47" let’s say 5.5" is more girth than 97.75% of men (+2 SD)

5.9" let’s say 6" is more girth than 99.9% of men (+3 SD)

Remember, even though 1,2,3 sigma = 67%, 95.5%, and 99.7% we are only smaller than the remaining high side of the distribution outside the sigma bound.

Nice man, thanks for sharing. Have nice one, cheers.

Good post. It’s nice to have a dose of reality about the figures here.

The study also covers flaccid and erect/flaccid stretched length.

Most importantly, only studies that had at least 50 participants, AND a health professional was the measurer, using standard procedures, were included.

I see that now from the full article. I’m so used to not having acces to those on Wiley that I don’t even check.

http://onlineli brary.wiley.com … /bju.13010/full

It’s a nice meta study and probably represents the best data we have.

What’s really shocking is a 5.17” mean and +3 SD Erect Length is 7.12”.

Your link (full study) states BPEL. I’m shocked. My junk is +3SD.

The SD is .65” a bit smaller than previous studies; but with n= 692, it is likely well founded.

Really hope this is true…I still have dysmorphia regarding my own size….but since I’ve seen past 7.5” BPEL I’m come to accept that I am long, but at a hair over 5” girth it still looks and feels thin (and the extra length probably adds to that). My end goals are still be to ridiculously big if I can, but girth is a little depressing since although I seem to gain length easy, girth hasn’t really budged at all. Honestly have the feeling I’m more likely to see 10x5.25 than I am to see 8.5x6. lol

The new study illustrates just how much of a monster a real 8” by 6” cock is, regardless of the bullshit that women spout.

A true 8x6 is a monster.

An 8.5x6.5 is an enormous beast.

Yes, 8” x 6” is huge. The most limiter factor is the combo: it’s already rare to find a true 8” BP but it’s much rarer to find one with 6” MSEG.

On another note.

The difference in volume between 5” girth and 5.5” girth is not 10% it is 21%.

That’s how much more displacement you are adding to stretch that pussy.

From 5” to 6” is 43%

From the average 4.6” to 6”, the volume increase is:

70%.

The volume difference between the average 5.17x4.6 dick and an 8.5x6.5 beast is:

350%

Guys,my opinion is that a girth over 5 inches is big. Not huge, but big. As for length 6 inches nbpel is considered big for me. Again, not huge but big. Most of my friends are from 5.3 to 6 inches nbpel. Only one of them has a length of about 8 inches. My penis looks thicker than all of theirs and my girth measurement was 5.2 before pe.I have always thought my penis was average sized but I did notice that all of the women I had could take only 2 fingers inside their vagina easily and my penis is about 3 fingers wide.Not all of them enjoyed three fingers. My women always moaned heavily when I penetrated them, which always was leaving me wonder cause all of them got crazy over my dick but called it average sized. I was 6.2 at best nbpel and 5.2 girth before pe.

How can you be so exact with friends re: 5.3 to 6 nbpel, without measuring?

Especially ERECT!!

rotflmao

Great thread kdong. Thank you for the information.

Girth measurements from studies should be much more reliable than length;

as there would be no doubt about BP vs NBP, etc.