Thunder's PE Data Page Analysis

I’ve decided to download the PE Data page and run my own analysis on measurements from the members here at Thunder’s.

I’m going with the assumption that all EL measurements are BP and all Girth numbers are at mid-shaft.

I threw this together quickly and only included the stats that seem to be most discussed here. Let me know if you’d like to see additional categories/stats.

NOTE: As of 08.03.03 there are 455 participants in Thunder’s PE Data chart. Of those, only 253 have more than one date entry. For this reason, all of the stats below are broken into “Starting Size” and “Current Size”.

Starting Size/First Measurements
Erect Length …… 6.438
Erect Girth …… 5.076
Flaccid Length …… 3.978
Flaccid Girth …… 3.962
Erect Width …… 1.616
Erect Volume …… 13.683

Current Size/Latest Measurements
Erect Length …… 7.094
Erect Girth …… 5.35
Flaccid Length …… 4.788
Flaccid Girth …… 4.448
Erect Width …… 1.703
Erect Volume …… 16.563

Gains for the 253 participants with at least 2 entries
Erect Length …… 0.763
Erect Girth …… 0.377
Flaccid Length …… 0.892
Flaccid Girth …… 0.612
Erect Width …… 0.12
Erect Volume …… 3.784
Avg Days at PE …… 270
Avg Weeks at PE …… 38.5
Avg Months at PE …… 9

Starting Size EL
0.0-4.5 …… 6 …… 1%
4.5-5.0 …… 11 …… 2%
5.0-5.5 …… 22 …… 5%
5.5-6.0 …… 94 …… 21%
6.0-6.5 …… 114 …… 25%
6.5-7.0 …… 74 …… 16%
7.0-7.5 …… 70 …… 15%
7.5-8.0 …… 38 …… 8%
8.0-8.5 …… 17 …… 4%
8.5-9.0 …… 5 …… 1%
9.0-9.5 …… 3 …… 1%
9.5-10 …… 1 …… 0%
Total …… 455

Starting Size EG
0.0-2.5 …… 1 …… 0%
3.0-3.5 …… 1 …… 0%
3.5-4.0 …… 5 …… 1%
4.0-4.5 …… 36 …… 8%
4.5-5.0 …… 137 …… 30%
5.0-5.5 …… 158 …… 35%
5.5-6.0 …… 78 …… 17%
6.0-6.5 …… 33 …… 7%
6.5-7.0 …… 3 …… 1%
7.0-7.5 …… 3 …… 1%
Total …… 455

Current Size EL
4.5-5.0 …… 1 …… 0%
5.0-5.5 …… 3 …… 1%
5.5-6.0 …… 12 …… 5%
6.0-6.5 …… 37 …… 15%
6.5-7.0 …… 55 …… 22%
7.0-7.5 …… 57 …… 23%
7.5-8.0 …… 51 …… 20%
8.0-8.5 …… 20 …… 8%
8.5-9.0 …… 11 …… 4%
9.0-9.5 …… 3 …… 1%
9.5-10 …… 3 …… 1%
Total …… 253

Current Size EG
4.0-4.5 …… 9 …… 4%
4.5-5.0 …… 44 …… 17%
5.0-5.5 …… 93 …… 37%
5.5-6.0 …… 67 …… 26%
6.0-6.5 …… 32 …… 13%
6.5-7.0 …… 5 …… 2%
7.0-7.5 …… 2 …… 1%
7.5-8.0 …… 1 …… 0%
Total …… 253

Another note worth mentioning:

In the “Gains” section, there were 4 or 5 participants with negative 0.5 or more in gains. I figured they accidently entered their stats backwards, but since they caused almost 10% difference in the total gain average, I went ahead and ommitted them from the results.

Nice one Stevie,

just a suggestion. Maybe you should just have ignored the 202 with just one entry, so we work with the same numbers in before and after?

Great work man. Thanks!

Welcome to the forum Stevie31
I love your work! Awesome breakdown on PE stats. GREAT WORK! Did you use a spreadsheet program?

Just a quick observation:

If I am, lets say, 8.0 EL, then do I fall into the category that is 20% or 8%?

Current Size EL
4.5-5.0 …… 1 …… 0%
5.0-5.5 …… 3 …… 1%
5.5-6.0 …… 12 …… 5%
6.0-6.5 …… 37 …… 15%
6.5-7.0 …… 55 …… 22%
7.0-7.5 …… 57 …… 23%
7.5-8.0 …… 51 …… 20%
8.0-8.5 …… 20 …… 8%
8.5-9.0 …… 11 …… 4%
9.0-9.5 …… 3 …… 1%
9.5-10 …… 3 …… 1%
Total …… 253

Great idea, Rocco. I’ll put that together next and submit a reply when it’s finished.

Thanks, supersizeit. Yeah, I used Microsoft Excel to house the data and VBA within Excel to compile the stats. You would fall into the 8% category for EL. Each category can be described as “greater than or equal to” for the first number.

Below are the updated “Starting Size” and “Gains” based solely on the 253 participants with at least two entries…

Starting Size/First Measurements
Erect Length …… 6.351
Erect Girth …… 4.980
Flaccid Length …… 3.944
Flaccid Girth …… 3.945
Erect Width …… 1.585
Erect Volume …… 12.855

Current Size/Latest Measurements
Erect Length …… 7.094
Erect Girth …… 5.350
Flaccid Length …… 4.788
Flaccid Girth …… 4.448
Erect Width …… 1.703
Erect Volume …… 16.563

Gains comparison
Erect Length …… 0.743
Erect Girth …… 0.370
Flaccid Length …… 0.844
Flaccid Girth …… 0.503
Erect Width …… 0.118
Erect Volume …… 3.708

Hmmmm, but 8.0 EL is greater than or equal to the first number in both catorgories :chuckle: Sorry to bust your balls man. :) Never mind, I know exactly what you mean and so does everyone else here. Just playing around.

I love to see work like this, it gives everyone a nice perspective of where they stand in the PE community. You deserve full praise for a job well done ;)

Yeah, yeah… I know, each beginning number could be said to be “greater than or equal to” the previous set. I was referring to each particular category.

Like I said, I did this whole analysis real quick, probably only 45 minutes or so. Hopefully more members will post their starting and current measurements so we can have a better average. We could also add other stats like “gains compared to length of time PE’ing” and “standard deviation” to establish a more constant average.

Anyways, thanks for keeping me in check, supersizeit. :)

Nice work.

This is all from “Sizes PE Data Site” correct? When entering my data I ended up with an extra entry with a weird starting date, and couldn’t get it to go away. My current entry of 7.5X6.25 was simply to check if that size was comparable (it was) to the volume of an 8X6 weiner. At one time I had an entry of 11X7 in that field, just out of curiosity as to the volume. Please feel free to disregard whatever weird number’s you might find in the first field in my entries.

Some of the big guys really need to update their current sizes….guys?

Are these EL’s BP or NBP?

Correct, all sizes are from the PE Data Page. I removed a few odd numbers from the analysis, especially in the case where the second entry was 0.5 or more less than the first entry. You can go back and edit any of your entries here.

When users click on “Enter New Measurements”, a pop-up window appears that explains the correct way to measure (BP). Hopefully everyone reads this and follows suit. I figure PE’ers are more cognisent of the correct way to measure than other surveys and trust that the majority of measurements in the PE Data Page are BP.

Hopefully, in a few months I’ll have some updating to do…. ;)

Then you’ll need to change all your analysis… I’m going to blow the numbers way out :D

Sounds good secjay, let me know when you enter your new numbers and I’ll re-run the query.

I have some additional analysis I’d like to add including amount of gain compared to total time PE’ing and member rankings. I’m sure you’ll be at the top of the list. :)

I can’t to believe I am only in the 6% of population at 5.75 inches. This is supposed to be average size, no?