What??? (Wikipedia on penis enlargement)

Can you believe the Wikipedia article on penis enlargement makes no mention of weights? (or MOI??? Just kidding ;-)

I think someone needs to add to it! I’m working on updating my site, which takes priority right now.

The Wikipedia article on PE is a battleground: the article has been locked for ages.

GM

I’m not responding to the poll, except to point out that Wikipedia (basically a good idea) is not monitored as closely as it should be by the experts responsible to keep various areas valid, as to fact.

You are a good example of what I am pointing out. You are updating your own site right now. And that is fine, and a good priority.

Is all the information on breast cancer at Wiki up to date? How would you know? How would I?

That article sucks.

On general scientific topics, Wikipedia is very good. Nature — alongside Science, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world — had experts review a random assortment of Wikipedia science articles and Britannica articles on the same topics . The two encyclopedias had a comparable number of errors (low in both cases).

Where Wikipedia blows is on more obscure topics (e.g., penis size), where there are fewer intelligent and informed contributors to keep editing articles to perfection, and especially on topics where there are Spamming angles and other controversies involved (e.g., penis enlargement). Surprisingly — or maybe not so surprisingly, given the obsessive back-and-forth partisan discussions that go on behind the scenes of such articles — Wiki entries on controversial topics with more widespread mainstream interest tend to be pretty good, in my opinion anyway.

Overall, Wikipedia seems pretty good. I wouldn’t rely on it, but as a substitute for a hardbound encyclopedia it has some advantages. For one, it’s more timely updated.

Use it to gather an overview of a subject and find search terms to use on your own.

The less people know about PE, the better, in my opinion.

Precisely. There are varying degrees to “knowing” about PE as well. It being on wikipedia and our exact methods put in some low level articles or splashed here and there is not too much. Going mainstream is pretty bad.
I don’t think many people here would enjoy PE going mainstream

The Fight Club of PE.

PE could save lives, relationships and confidence.

A guy in some Asian country jumped because he didn’t like his size. It’s a thread somewhere this forum (too lazy to search ;) )

/Swensk

Amen to that one!

I’m glad Tom didn’t think that way.

People that are committing suicide because their dicks are small probably already know about all the penis enlargement options including PE. If anything, I’d bet PE remaining “underground” would give the guys that really find themselves inadequate more of a chance. On the other hand, if it was mainstream and average Joes were doing it left and right, then there would be no opportunity for these guys to make up the difference.

What does encyclopedia Britannica say about PE? Anyone check it out?

well, not me :bigwink:

Or you Thunder.

Sorry guys, but as a guy that came here with a well below average starting size, and my confidence well down, I thank God for people like Tom, Thunder and everyone else that has ever shared their success (and failures) of PE with me and others.
I truly don’t know where I would be today without PE and their invaluable experience.