Originally Posted by Tom Foolery
So my question is, when is a bulge look too indecent? If a guy who is only 4 inches walks around erect is that any different from a guy who is flaccid say 7 or 8 inches and 6 inches around?
I think there is a glaring difference between a flaccid bulge and an erect bulge - certainly the rigidity of the erect bulge, not the size, gives it away. I personally feel that an erect bulge can make you look like a weirdo (if it’s out in public, not in private with a ladyfriend - whereas it would be a turn-on).
I know that women stare at bulges a lot - and they share info with one another, to be sure. I think a huge flaccid bulge leaves them wondering “What the hell is he packing?” whereas a frequent erect bulge may leave them thinking that you have blue balls because you don’t get laid - or that you’re some kind of pervert who can’t control himself.
One time, at a baseball game, I saw a bunch of women fussing over a guy with an erect bulge. He was a father of one of the players on the field, and the guy had fallen asleep on the bleachers. He was sprawled out, and wearing sweat pants, and he was obviously 100% erect (and well-endowed). One of the mothers sitting in front of me noticed it. I saw her elbowing the other women and they were all staring with obvious delight. When I looked over I saw the guy - at full mast in all his glory. But I think in most instances, an erect bulge is embarrassing.