Originally Posted by UpTo7
Isn’t LOT theory dismissed around here?
LOT Theory: I Only Used the Terminology to Describe Some Angles
Insomuch as LOT theory attempts to predict ligament gains yes, it is very controversial, and was not proven with a second attempt (it worked for the original data-set, that’s how the theory was born). But I'm not using LOT theory in that context, I’m just using it as an easy reference to describe the angle from which your penis exits your pelvis. LOT theory is irrelevant here, except that I’m using it to explain the potential current state of your ligaments. It’s common knowledge that some guys have a penis that naturally points straight down & some guys have a penis that points straight out.
Ligaments First, Tunica Second?
Theoretically, it should be easier to maximize suspensory ligament deformation gains vs Tunica gains. If that was in dispute, I was unaware. In fact, I believe the exact opposite is true. It appears there’s a consensus that Tunica deformation gains are more difficult to create than ligament deformation gains. Now as far as maximizing suspensory ligament gains, I did provide a link explaining why it is important to do this before you proceed to Tunica work.
Originally Posted by UpTo7
As for ADS, I’m not sure I’m going to be able to wear it very much. I mean, I’ll try, but I’m not sure 5 or even 8 hours a day is going to be possible. Is that a big problem?
Split Sets Ideal
An ADS may help a bit, but at least one split set, 12 hours from your other sets might help more (Bib is convinced of this). I think the reason is that an ADS might not be as effective in pulling the crimps out of your ligaments and stretching them back out (so you can heal some more in an elongated state again).
Originally Posted by marinera
Hanging is based on creeping of fibers. The longer the load is applied without rest, the easier the creep is produced. Intuitively, when you rest your penis tends to return to its original length.
Time vs Weight
I agree with Marinera and I always liked his theory Loading, lengthening, healing. (That statement is at least along the same line of thought). The theory explains to some extent why hangers may experience ‘sudden gains’ as well as the importance of cementing gains. It provides a good contrast to time vs weight (e.g. extenders vs hanging devices).
As an extreme example, very high weight for a very short time will not produce gains, and very light weight (or almost no weight at all) will not produce gains even over long periods of time.
In my opinion it supports the idea that you’ll need to hang for a decent amount of time (e.g. 10 hours per week) to optimize your gains, otherwise you’ll just be letting yourself continually heal shorter.
The issue with an extender is that at some point, it may fail to produce fatigue (due to the limited force it can produce); in contrast, hanging can always produce fatigue (since there’s no limit on the weight that can be used). I could say more on this, but I think I’m going off-topic ;)