>The basic theory I used here was that vacuum pulls the same amount at every surface of the penis, regardless of orientation.<
Right. But the pressure within the penis rises to some degree also. If the internal shaft pressure rises to near equilbirium with the vacuum drawn in the tube, a good portion of the penis isn’t being “pulled on” very much. The primary pull is at the base, and increases with the cross-sectional area.
> A larger diameter cylinder will not subject the penis to any greater vacuum or any greater pulling force than a smaller diameter cylinder that still fits the penis. All the larger cylinder will do is suck more pubic mound and scrotum into the cylinder.<
A larger tube won’t cause any more vacuum because vacuum is determined by the user.
A larger tube at a given vacuum will provide more total pulling force than a smaller one, no? But I understand what you’re saying: the extra area isn’t useful because it’s not affecting the shaft, only sucking in more scrotum skin. So, you’re right, shaft base area is probably a more accurate figure than tube cross-section.
An oversized tube shouldn’t diminish the pull. Won’t help, but won’t hurt either. A tightly-fitting (packed) tube may reduce it to some extent because of the skin friction, though as Shiver pointed out, lube may make it negligible.