Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

A Cure For Circumcision

I am cut but if I had a son, I would not have him cut. I had a daughter instead so it never came up.

I like going natural when at all possible.

I don’t care for fake tits, tattoos , piercings or any of it.

The human body is beautiful if it is cared for and not abused. Tattoos remind me of graffiti on a beautiful building. Sorry, if I stepped on some toes but it’s not personal.

Fake tits are fine only if they don’t look fake but big hard balloons? Give me a break! I’d rather have saggy tits in my face than hard balloons. Piercings? Mutilation and so is circumcision. My opinion only.

Type cure for circumcision in Google, you get better results for your problem, from what iv read so far on Google, is it can take 7 years to stretch the skin over your glans and the tip of the foreskin has a muscle which the doctor removed when he circumcised you so if you do stretch to regrow the skin to cover the glans over the years it won’t look like same as someone who is not circumcised.

At best the only way I can think of to safely stretch the skin is to hang with a weight with a bandage that sticks to the skin.


Bpel start 14.25cm

My Straw

Foreskin restoration

Originally Posted by Swole Straw
Type cure for circumcision in Google, you get better results for your problem, from what iv read so far on Google, is it can take 7 years to stretch the skin over your glans and the tip of the foreskin has a muscle which the doctor removed when he circumcised you so if you do stretch to regrow the skin to cover the glans over the years it won’t look like same as someone who is not circumcised.

At best the only way I can think of to safely stretch the skin is to hang with a weight with a bandage that sticks to the skin.

You are correct…
Hanging with weight with the foreskin pulled over the glans during the hang session will indeed stretch the skin. Depending on your skin’s elasticity you can restore your natural look within a couple years. Post hang - pull foreskin over the glans, use one piece of microfoam tape to secure and then a Girth Band behind the glans will keep the foreskin stretched throughout the day.

Originally Posted by Amerikanisch
Were you circumcised before or after puberty?
I would like to hear from the fellows who were circumcised later in life and who can describe the differences in sensitivity before and after circumcision, if any.
Incidentally that frenulum masturbation was when I was 12 or 13, just starting down the path of self-gratification. Later on, I learned the “right” way. Probably through porn.

I was circumcised way before puberty. I don’t even remember the whole thing.

I would also like to hear from the guys who can say the difference in sensitivity. If there is any, uncut guys must have a fucking high sensitivity. Even being cut, I can feel the minor friction.

Originally Posted by curiousguy20
hear from the guys who can say the difference in sensitivity.


When men cut after sexual debut comment, make sure you know how many years it has been since they were cut - the damage is progressive.

Make sure you know what their experience was like before being cut. They may have had issues which were indeed worse than average, but it would be hard to know if the best remedy for them was indeed circumcision, or if a less-drastic surgery or a non-surgical intervention could have solved it.

My doctor left a lot of skin below the glans on the frenulum side, my cut on the other side is shaped like a “triangle” and most of my frenulum was saved. Super duper sensitive. There is a tiny, tiny little pink oval of skin on the scar in this area that, when touched, feels like it reaches into the heart and root of my penis. I call it the “clit” of my penis. It is more sensitive than any other part. I don’t know why the doctor cut me the way he did, he must have known this would save a lot of sensitive and nerves. Maybe my dad was cut like that and he told the doctor about it? No idea.

I have weird theories about circumcision. One is that severe autism in male children might be caused by the insane levels of pain, and fear, that come with circ procedures. My sister in law said she was adamantly against cutting her new son but her husband was all for it. (He totally sucks as a man, by the way.) She said she’s never heard a child scream like that before. It was blood curdling. She cried and was extremely upset. I thought about this and wondered what effect this has on a young boy’s brain. Could be traumatizing in ways we have no idea about. I know boys have been cut for centuries, and autism seems to be a more recent problem, but it all makes me wonder.

I also wonder if cutting might make some boys grow up to be asexual. Not really into sexual pleasure either giving or receiving. If you grab your cock and try to do something with it, and you were cut quite heavily and there’s not much left as far as nerves, and you don’t feel a whole lot of pleasure, why care about sex? I’m not saying that males that have low to no sex drive are that way because of circumcision. I’m saying that being cut too much might hurt the penis and remove too many pleasure nerves and prevent sexual gratification. I have known several men who have admitted they don’t care for blowjobs because they don’t feel like anything to them. When pressed on the woman’s technique, they say that she tries a lot but not much feeling. I wonder if those guys were cut more heavily than needed and they lost too many nerves.

I don’t know, just some weird musings from me. I’m weird!


Starting length, Spring 2003: bpel 6 3/8", bpfsl ~6 1/2", flaccid ~3-4" (never measured flaccid stretched or hanging flaccid; starting girth was probably ~5"-5 1/4")

Summer 2004: bpel 7 7/8", bpfsl 8 1/8", flaccid ~4", erect girth 5.3"

Spring 2018: bpel 7 1/4", bpfsl 7 5/8", erect girth 5 1/8"; Spring 2020: bpel 7 3/4", bpfsl 8", erect girth 5 3/8". Current - August 2023: bpel 7 3/4", bpfsl 8", erect girth mid shaft 5 1/4" (5 1/2" at base)

The WHO declared that circumcision is a catastrophic action resulting too many side effects mentally and physically, in addition at least 2 cm less in penis lenght.

Circumcised is a “neater” look

and I have heard women complain about the cheesy gunk that forms under the skin ( I forget the name but it sounds gross and smelly),

Maybe that only forms when the hygiene is bad.

Still, If you lose sensitivity, I’d rather go to the trouble of keeping it clean and the look isn’t all that bad.

To: Pumped menber

Unless the Dr. is a complete idiot and cuts off your glans along with the foreskin, you are still going to have enough sensitivity to enjoy sex.

It may not be the 3D, technicolor and dolby sound experience that it could have been, but it will still be enjoyable.

There are no arguments for circumcision without a medical indication.

1 and 2 With appropriate hygiene, these claims can not be upheld.

Hygiene means washing the penis in the morning, in the evening and after use with the foreskin retracted.

3 There’s no arguing about looks. I like uncircumcised penises much better. In addition, the foreskin is intended to protect the sensitive glans. This is so provided by nature and therefore certainly not wrong. A long foreskin has the advantage that it is great for masturbating. Because you always have a vulva, so to speak. The circumcision in different religions was ultimately made for hygienic reasons and then religiously transfigured over the years. The religions prescribing this are all originated in areas where water shortage was. Religions that have arisen in other areas without water shortage require no circumcision. The prudish US Americans originally introduced circumcision to curb masturbation. This does not work as we know. But out of ignorance, the circumcision was continued. Luckily, this calamity also subsides in the USA.


Masturbation is better than sex!

To: folks

I would not count foreskin as part of penis length anyway. It’s the sausage, not the casing, that counts.

Spiritual significance of circumcision for Jewish religion

Originally Posted by Jagtstein
There are no arguments for circumcision without a medical indication.
1 and 2 With appropriate hygiene, these claims can not be upheld.
Hygiene means washing the penis in the morning, in the evening and after use with the foreskin retracted.
3 There’s no arguing about looks. I like uncircumcised penises much better. In addition, the foreskin is intended to protect the sensitive glans. This is so provided by nature and therefore certainly not wrong. A long foreskin has the advantage that it is great for masturbating. Because you always have a vulva, so to speak. The circumcision in different religions was ultimately made for hygienic reasons and then religiously transfigured over the years. The religions prescribing this are all originated in areas where water shortage was. Religions that have arisen in other areas without water shortage require no circumcision. The prudish US Americans originally introduced circumcision to curb masturbation. This does not work as we know. But out of ignorance, the circumcision was continued. Luckily, this calamity also subsides in the USA.

What is the purpose of circumcision? The best way to say it is this. We learn by object lessons, okay? Especially in a more primitive time in the unfolding of God’s revelation in the Old Testament, God gave His people many, many object lessons, didn’t He? I mean just - just their whole religion was a series of object lessons. Life was filled with ceremonies and ceremonies and ceremonies and ceremonies, ritual upon ritual upon ritual upon ritual.

There was this thing to do and that thing to do and the other thing to do, and this was symbolic in so many, many cases. Every animal that was ever sacrificed was a symbol of the ultimate sacrifice of Christ, right? Every cleansing, every washing of a pot, washing of a pan, washing of the hands, washing of the feet, every ceremonial washing they went through was a symbol of the inward washing of the heart. In the Old Testament economy, God was always giving out outward symbols to identify what He wanted to say about inward responses and inward attitudes.

Now, circumcision is one of those very same things. And circumcision was a symbol of cleansing. And when a child, a baby was born, the eighth day, the foreskin was removed, and it was, in a way, a symbol of the removal of sin from the life. In other words, God was saying to them - and you do it all the time, all the time - it’s painful, it’s bloody, and so forth and so on - and the picture was that what God is doing here is giving you a symbol of what He wants to do in your heart.

And that’s why the Bible says circumcise your hearts, you know, cut off that which contributes to your uncleanness, cut that off so that the outward symbol is only a sign or an indication of what God wanted done in the heart. And He makes that very clear throughout the Old Testament. Circumcise your heart - circumcise your hearts, comes the cry of the Old Testament. And so, circumcision was just another one of God’s symbols. And it was a very dominant one. Every child that was born went through that, and it was a way to constantly remind the people that there was an inner reality of cleansing that God was after.

Originally Posted by Amerikanisch
It’s the sausage, not the casing, that counts.

You EAT a sausage.

The penis does it’s job by interaction. That interaction all occurs at the surface. 50% less surface means 50% less interaction.

Informed adults can decide for themselves, unless we fail to protect them as children.

Originally Posted by LGHanger
the foreskin was removed, and it was, in a way, a symbol of the removal of sin from the life.


Informed adults (or bar mitzvah boys) can decide for themselves whether to put any stock in such a proposition. They might immediately notice no comparable sacrifice of flesh was asked of their sisters.

Originally Posted by LGHanger
the Bible says circumcise your hearts


The New Testament says that only this heart circumcision is called for - no cutting.

Originally Posted by LGHanger
Every child that was born went through that


Only a tiny proportion of earth’s population has ever practiced infant circumcision.

The Old Testament significance of circumcision is so strong it even says to circumcise your slaves. Funny how it never gets around to stating that slavery is evil. Informed adults can decide for themselves how much credence to place in such a book.

Circumcisions was and is only purely for hygienic reasons


Bpel start 14.25cm

My Straw

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 PM.