Well I know doctors, sexperts and so on tend to err on the side of caution, but I for one find it unlikely that precum contains any sperm if there has been no previous sexual contact for a while. I mean if you’ve cum about an hour ago and then start again then the precum most definitely will contain sperm, but for a “new” encounter, as it were, I would be willing to bet that there is no sperm in it. Although, perhaps if you go at it for long enough, and are still precumming, then maybe some sperm would have moved along the tubes :-k
Having said that, the reason people tend to stray on the side of caution is because they don’t want people to listen to their advice and then get pregnant from it, just like I don’t want you to get someone pregnant from what I’ve said, so I’ll say that stranger things have happened than precum containing sperm and leave it for you tomake the decisions based upon the pictures and information on the page you linked to. :p
My vote? Pre-cum does not defnitely contain sperm, but also does not definitely not contain sperm, unless there is no sperm near the cowpers glands on in the urethra that could get mixed with it. But as I say, err onthe side of caution.
Start: 22 Mar 04: 6.5" BPEL x 4.6" EG & 6" head. As at: 1 Jan 05: 7.5" BPEL x 4.8-4.9" EG & 6.3" head.
Re-re-start!: 6 Feb 17: 6.9" BPEL x 4.9" EG & 5.5" head. As of: 23 Feb 17: 7.0" BPEL x 5.0" EG & 6.0" head.
Ideal: ASAP: 8+" BPEL x 5.5+" EG & 6.5+" head But will continue if the going is good!!