Ok so I’ve been thinking in the 5 minutes since I posted and I figure that 5 minutes of thought is already 299 seconds more thought than baby circumcision aficionados will be able to follow so I cut it short. My deep thinking has produced a break through for all you people who think it’s a good idea to chop off bits of a baby - YOU’VE BEEN KEEPING THE WRONG PART!!
It’s simple logic really. If you cut things off to prevent them being in the way, or getting dirty, or possibly looking bad to some as yet unmet person, or to suit society and religion then it’s simple. Every other body part has more associated diseases, potential problems and embarrassments than the foreskin.
Take for example, the head of a baby mutilator. It’s just a useless bit of skin with a bony bubble inside it that they never use. Yet it carries so many risks - headaches, it might be ugly, it needs to be cleaned constantly or else it emits a foul stench, it harbors pests, it gets banged into things, other people assume a head to contain a functioning brain so it causes things to be written and said that help continue pointless mutilation of babies and so on. The head in their case should be gotten rid of when young as well as all the other body parts that carry risks.
The foreskin on the other hand is quite innocuous in comparison.
So, if you are determined to mutilate your baby, keep the wonderfully simple and comparatively trouble free foreskin and give the bit you don’t want to someone who can treat a baby humanely and grow it into a useful and thoughtful human being.
And take heart - the real you, the “uncluttered you” that you really want to be, might be yet be lying in a medical dump somewhere.
Suppose I’ll get banned for such an abusive stance. Worth it. Bye.