Uncircumcised is better for both partners

I know a majority of Christian, jewish, US, etc are circumcised and unfortunately cannot do much to change that fact. According to surveys though women seem to find the uncircumcised penis more pleasurable and prefer an uncut partner. http://www.moth ersagainstcirc. … x-cut-uncut.htm

The rate of vaginal orgasm is nearly double if i am reading the statistics correctly. I did a search within this forum and found that there is alot of talk about getting circumcised and not enough about why you shouldn’t. For the man, the number of intact nerves and underexposed glans is more sensitive. For the women, better lubrication, comfort, shorter strokes, longer sessions due to less soreness and more stimulation of the clitoris and mons. I’ll let you do the research. I am just posting this to try to discourage anyone from getting circumcised or getting their child circumcised.

I sometimes wonder what ol’ Willy looked like with his hat on…oh if we could turn back time.

I am plenty sensitive in, on, and around my glans. I am cut, my sons will be cut, his sons will be cut, and so on. Starting an organization to stop circumcision is absurd. If people are against circumcision — don’t get one.

>>For the women, better lubrication, comfort, shorter strokes, longer sessions due to less soreness and more stimulation of the clitoris and mons.<<

This is something that can never be proved.
Shorter strokes? What does that have to do with being un/cut?
(Dogs use short, fast strokes. Not pimp-daddys like me.)

And where is the extra lubrication coming from?

Vulvas come in so many varieties of shapes and sizes. Surely, you must admit the individual vulva has a big role in clitoral stimulation, lubrication, etc.

By the way, have you ever seen a dildo with foreskin?

Can you say “selection bias”? :)

As long as there are no medical problems with the foreskin, why cut? Nature has given man the skin for a reason, one would think.

But since I’m not cut, it would make me biased, I guess.

LOL. I agree. I myself am cut and opted for it to be that way. People who are uncut or want their foreskin back, thats fine, but jesus christ if people arent against it and call it mutilation (as if the penis is permanently disfigered and unsightly to look at). Its personal preference. How would uncut guys or guys who want foreskin feel if cut guys said hey join the club you freaks, whats wrong with you? You should be cut like us. This seems to be the norm on every site, cut guys dont say a word, so uncut guys or foreskin wanters, get over it. I dont see why you feel the need to try to force your opinions on everyone else, its like a bunch of religious nuts. LUI’s thread is filled with people bashing circumsion. All im trying to say is dont try and make a case against it, it gets old, and I find it insulting. Find other thinbgs to talk about other than your OPINION regarding circumsion.

For one thing, circumcision reduces the chances of STD transmission: /forum/showthre … ?t=41291&page=3

But I think everyone should decide for himself and I won’t be having my own sons (if I have any) circumcised at birth. There are upsides and downsides to the procedure.

Nature has given women vaginal pubic hair, but how many people like that? So your logic is a bit flawed no?

Necro,

I didn’t know that foreskin will grow back after awhile…..I mean, pubic hair does, no?

Claiming circumcision reduces STD is inconclusive, and if you do more research other studies show circumcised men have higher occurrences of infection. Google

To answer the previous issue about lubrication and dildos. Have you seen dildos used often without lube? Mostly the lubrication is not increased, it is conserved because it is not pulled out of the vagina. I don’t think its very easy to make a foreskin equipped dildo. Not to mention a woman (in the US) less likely has had experience with uncut men.

Para - Goomba , I’m glad you would rather give your sons a choice rather than irreversibly deciding for them.

My dad is intact and he chose to have me circumcised. I don’t know if I would or wouldn’t have my sons (if I have any) circumcised.

As for my part, I’d have them choose at the age of 18.

They would have plenty of time until then to decide wether they want to be cut or not, I think.

As for not having much that a cut man can do about it, you can restore your foreskin. That seems like a pretty good way to restore your foreskin.

Dmitri- you cannot really restore foreskin. The current methods are the attempt of stretching what is left to form one. Alot of the foreskin nerves, frenulum are removed in circumcision. Growing up with glans exposed has already desensitized the glans too. I don’t want to get people who have had it done riled up, just wanted people to think about leaving it up to the individual to decide.

Hey guys.

This is silly. Uncut - cut. Whatever. It is the same thing in the end. One is not better than the other in the long run. I leave it up to personal preference. I think that the decision should be made by the person the unit belongs to and not by some doctor or uninformed parent.

Being cut at birth posses some risks and in the worst cases gender reassignment if infection gets nasty!

So all in all one is not better, but getting cut does pose more immediate risks than staying natural does. Being uncut, however, appears to promote a more serious possibility of STD infection later in life as has been seen in certain studies.

See the thread “Opting for circumcision” in the Men’s Sexual Health Forum