Girth limit

Because of Big Girtha’s gains, your theory must be flawed.

You have to do a little study and a little prayer and a little faith than some mysteries will reveal themselves. The atmosphere was completely different before the Flood, the high concentration of oxygen caused everything to grow to enormous size. It was quite intoxicating in every respect; life spans were 10x what they are today, all things living benefited from the intense oxygenation of the atmosphere.

This atmospheric condition was the case and the tenants of “Built-in Capacity Theory” dovetail nicely with this phenomena. Making your penis larger is a result of improving the flowmetrics and blood characteristics of the erection. At an earlier time this would not have been necessary, the boner would have been supreme.

Okee Dokee then. Thanks.

I’m hearing that Twighlight Zone music in my head….

By the way, plants would grow larger with an excess of CO2, not oxygen, and humans are larger now than they have ever been.

As far as girth growth, like others have said, if there is evidence here that disproves your limit theory, then why do you stick with it?

I think Shilow is the screen name for Jerry Falwell! I knew that guy was into PE!

X-Files music here…….(:

This thread is hilarious!

I just love listening to dogmatic creationists. They’re so very entertaining.

People always bring up the one or two or three “freaks” that somehow their extraordinary gains disprove a theory. There will always be anomalies for any given situation. Great advances in science and medicine are not without small populations that do not fit the norm. Penicillin is attributed with many unfortunate outcomes but that does not mean it does not work or is not efficacious for the great majority of people it benefits.

Though it may seem dark to you now, one day your eyes will be open.

All being said..

The man with a purpose, patience, focus and commitment will succeed all his limits.
So why not outcome penis size limits?

Let´s clamp.

Yes, that is what got Big Girtha his gains. I used BG as the example in my previous post because his big girth gains demonstrate what commitment can do. Granted, his commitment is extreme, and a more moderate approach is prudent, but it also underlines cuda’s point.

ROFL! See what I mean?

Hear, hear!

Are you trying to make a point out of this contradictory gamish of opinion?

:)