penis enlargement in the main stream media

An article in the main stream media today says that PE doesn’t work:

httpxs://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2018/10/25/penis_enlargement_is_mostly_pseudoscientific_bs.ht ml#

(paste into your browser, delete the first x, and include both lines in the above paragraph)

They have the story partly right: pills don’t work. But they also say that pumping and “traction devices” don’t work either. I think that 350,000 members at Thunder’s Place have a different point of view.

Pretty typical for MSM. The only one I’ve seen that gives PE a somewhat fair shake is the one in Slate from years ago that mentions TP and DLD. That’s the one that prompted me to find TP. You’re right, though. Most mainstream articles just parrot whatever the urologist they’ve interviewed tells them.

That’s a good example of why the MSM is losing relevance in most aspects of people’s lives. Who cares - Except some fellas are going to believe this sort of “press” and get surgery instead of just tugging their way to a bigger and better tool.

The amateurism of mass medias is reflecting that of medical research. Has any seemingly successful PEer here ever been contacted by a searcher to follow their routine and measure the results? Those who manage to gain are a possible phenomenon that goes against their beliefs and they don’t want to investigate it. Medical research is probably the most conservative and crooked field due to how well it attracts the biggest control freaks. In the world we’re building, people will have to be their own searchers if they want to stay in the race.

“Case reports and poor quality cohort studies suggest that traction devices could actually stretch the penis by 1.5 to 2.5 centimeters.”

At least they acknowledge this, but then in context they minimize it.

That right there undercuts their whole premise. Who wouldn’t be pleased with a 1” length gain?

Very true. Also which factor sets this limit? If its possible to increase the penis 1 inch, then its very possible that you can increase it more. Thats the logic.

Yes exactly, most clinical studies do not have unlimited resources and there is a pressure to publish. There’s nothing out there past a year, so there is nothing that is published that can speak to limits

Main stream media is for the stupid and the poor.

Given the amount of empirical evidence here on ThundersPlace, I’d say there is no limit. As long as you have the dedication, you can go as far as you want.