Question about LOT and erection.

Does your erection angle have anything to do with your lot? Because my angle of erection is almost completly vertical when hard. Or is the LOT thing just having to do when you are flaccid and experiening tugback from kegals?

Your location, I guess, makes it easy for this question to linger unanswered for a while considering the time asked. :) I can’t help you with this situation which I apologize for in advance. I just was curious about the question. Are you unsatisfied with the position of your penis when it is erect? Or are you just questioning why you have a vertical erection. (Which I always thought was most appealing).

Anna -

Speaking from experience, the tough thing about vertical (pointing to the nose) erections is that it limits the positions one can use during intercourse. As an example, my wife can certainly be on top, which she really likes - but she can’t really sit up well, or lean back at all. If her breasts come up off my chest more than a foot or so the angle of penetration starts to hurt her. I don’t believe it has much to do with my size (I’m thick, but not overly long), just the way my willie wiggles, I guess.

I’ve often wished for a more “normal” erection angle…something where we wouldn’t be quite so confined in our choice of positions.

Oh, see. I am thinking about how it looks visually. I do get pretty limited when it comes to thinking beyond certain points. I guess I should get beyond that and think about how it functions. Thanks. I’ll really have to learn to take more things into consideration.

How does one correct that?

hmm, no i really wasn’t concerned with how it is during sex but how the angle relates to the whole LOT thing and if it means anything. However, good info.

Well, you can correct your thinking by…you know, thinking with your dick. Like a guy. :D

As to how to correct it via PE, I don’t know. My guess is that some of the vets may have an idea as to whether LOT and stretching angles will “fix” things over time. I’m hopeful they do, and I’ve attacked it as such, but I’m far too much of a noob to have any real evidence yet.

Nice you know that you appreciate the visual qualities of such an erection, however. :D I think that to most others, it gives the appearance of larger size. Funny, because that angle definitely makes it measure smaller than it would with a regular horizontal erection. Coupled with a nice upward curve, I’m missing a good inch in measurement. Or at least that’s what I tell myself.

qpalzm,

My erection is about 10 o’clock whereas my lot is between 8 and 9. I don’t know if that relative distance is common or not. What did you measure your lot at?

fatman,

I haven’t tried hanging personally, but I would expect that to be able to stretch the ligs from the top and allow more positions while getting you that inch of usable back.

My LOT was 9:30 and my erection angle is about 11. Perhaps there is some correlation?

According to BIB LOT theory, Lot and erection angle are not related.
You can also have a look at the following thread that discusses erection angle:

We need Further Analyzation of Erection Angle

Regards, Paul

Oh the things I really want to say but won’t. :D I guess it does give the appearance of a larger unit.

Is there a lot of confusion about the LOT theory?

I feel that they are related. With my routine I do all upward stretches for a week and then downward the next and so on. My penis used to aim straight out but I notice that after the upward angle week it points higher towards the sky. My theory is to lengthen the tunica and then the ligs and so on back and forth.

Men are easy targets…we tend to set ourselves up for these things. Probably has to do with the incomplete thought processes that come from thinking with our less evolved brain. I can be downright intelligent when the swelling subsides, I promise. ;)

I think it does look larger to the onlooker. Perhaps that’s why you like it?

Noobs like myself always have a bit of confusion about the LOT theory. I comprehend it pretty nicely I think, and one of the first things that popped into my head after study was wondering whether exercise according to LOT could affect one’s erection angle over the long term, not just ones gains from “smarter” stretching. It only makes sense, given the correlation I have between high, tight ligs and low angle stretching. Whether others see the same in the theory, or whether we can even make a large enough sample size to try, I don’t know.