Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Scientific Evidence

Scientific Evidence

Hi everyone!

I was wondering if there is already a dedicated section (in the forum) where are collected all the papers and scientific works about PE?

Many thanks in advance

Interesting and super recent study:

Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices

(AUTHORS: Abida Sultana, Peter Grice, Josip Vukina, Ian Pearce & Vaibhav Modgil )

Nature Reviews Urology (2021)

Do you have access to the full article? I can only access the abstract.

Originally Posted by Ciuchino
Interesting and super recent study:

Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices

(AUTHORS: Abida Sultana, Peter Grice, Josip Vukina, Ian Pearce & Vaibhav Modgil )

Nature Reviews Urology (2021)

Originally Posted by Azmike
Do you have access to the full article? I can only access the abstract.

The takeaways are:

Both PTT and VED are good for erectile functions and penile health. That’s about it.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Originally Posted by Azmike
Do you have access to the full article? I can only access the abstract.

yes, I have.

You should also find it using Sci hub

Originally Posted by Kyrpa
The takeaways are:

Both PTT and VED are good for erectile functions and penile health. That’s about it.

Well, that’s just a tiny part. There’s much more in it

Originally Posted by Ciuchino
Well, that’s just a tiny part. There’s much more in it

It is a review of wide range of studies done before. It confirms collectively what previous research has indicated already.

It shows the practises working in rehabilitation from serious surgery and in treatment of several penis disease caused adverse effect such found with Peyronies etc.

It tells that PTT is better in straightening curvature than VED.
It tells all about the positive results treating penises having various problems.
There is only one reference of treating small penis syndrome. Healthy penises which have no actual fault other than individual thinking it to be too small. And they had some positive results but there were also non-responders.
Does it sound familiar to anybody?

You can take this review as guidance but the real thing lays in the original studies referred.
I think there were 176 references.

This review is just IMO, very lame collection of the research done earlier. Nothing New.
Their conclusions do not make us jumping all over the place cheering.

We should dig deep in the reference list.
I can call out several favorites of mine already.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Scientific evidence for PE!NudgetrackerPenis Enlargement1903-18-2023 01:07 PM
If PE really works, why is there no scientific evidencekeatuPenis Enlargement Basics9405-08-2010 11:37 AM
Scientific Penis Size Study6goin47Penis Enlargement412-10-2003 10:27 AM
The Bunny Rabbit and Bigger Dick Connection-Another Scientific Breakthrough?peforealPenis Enlargement1407-23-2003 02:59 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:09 PM.