Study clamping Dogs

Here are some of the effects clamping had on dogs . It’s kind of worrying to me that acute clamping still had an increase in collagen. What do you guys think

With a knick-knack paddywhack
Give a dog a boner

Looks like a good study, gotta read it tomorrow though, looked at too many PE studies already today.

LOL

Could be scar tissue

I didn’t read the whole thing because obviously you know fuck that but I’m pretty sure that they clamped those poor dogs for a long time and with extreme methods, something that we don’t do at all.

Personally I clamp from January of this year 10 minutes each time and my EQ and size have only got better.

There’s the development of collateral circulation and vascular enlargement. That’s all I needed to read. Anyway, collagen formation in itself is not bad. Why is everyone so afraid of it (andfrom whay I’ved observed immediately equate it to scar tissue formation?)

Well increase in collagen aids erectile disfunction here is the study and priapism is one of the dangers that lead to fibrosis but that seems to be time dependent. I would also like to suggest not clamping erect and maybe clamping semi and increasing with kegels like tntjockey that technique probably works best because after some time clamping my penis when erect I got really bad EQ.

The study also states”The temporary loss of erectile function after acute bilateral clamping and the retention of potency after chronic occlusion mimic the clinical situation of post-traumatic impotence of purely arteriogenic origin. Gibson reported a series of patients with post-traumatic impotence who regained erectile function after six to 19 months, and Chambers and Balfour reported one patient whose erection returned after four years. Recovery after such a delay can be explained by the development of rich collaterals to the penis.” I’ll just stick with Jelqing for now

All I can think about is who the hell had the idea to clamp dog dicks?

My initial and lingering response is WTF???

I fucking died.

Within the first three sentences of the abstract it is stated that occlusion was maintained for two months. Not exactly what we are doing.

I bet they used weiner dogs

The study actually stated that histologic changes in collagen does not corellate to senescence or erectile disfunction. So, increased collagen is not an indicator for erectile function. Yes it is increased in priaprism and peyronies but it is not ESTABLISHED as the CAUSE.

Also, the study just says if we occlude the vascular channels, out bodies will try to make new ones to regain function. This article if taken to an extreme just says if we clamp for 3 months we will still get out erection back. This actually encouraged me to clamp longer times.

Yes that is why I said aides.If you have poor blood flow plus increased collagen then its easier to have ED but if you have good blood flow then I think It won’t affect as much but then that would probably mean having to do PE your whole life in order to maintain good blood flow I pressume

Well there is a chronic one and an acute one The chronic occlusion I understand was the whole two months, but the acute clamping I don’t really understand how long but I assume It was only while stimulating the erection but in that case it would only be maybe a minute.But not sure