Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

65 days without ejaculating

I disagree, I think ejaculation is good for women to receive. And I think it’s selfish for men to hold out for months. I think a woman receives energy from a man’s orgasm, and gives it back to the man through heart chakra orgasms, if the man is open to receiving that. I know that’s not taoist, but that’s what I think. Having an orgasm every couple weeks isn’t all that draining, is it?


I think it's the woman's job to tighten up to fit her man--it's lots easier for us.

Buy my book! The Orgasmic Diet by Marrena Lindberg

Originally Posted by john william
I remember in my youth feeling so alive and connected to the universe until I whacked off and then I just wanted to recover.

Have you re felt any connection with the universe at all? I used to feel that a few years back as well but I figured I have just gotten de-sensitized to the world, unfortunately. I am looking for any way to reconnect. Let me know how your spiritual journey is going.

[QUOTE=kaan]
I doubt there is a thing called “backward ejaculation”
You either ejaculate or not. If you don’t, it stays at the balls. [QUOTE]

Consider a Google search of “retrograde ejaculation”; see what you find.

Also, do some reading on male anatomy in general. About 5 percent of total ejaculate comes from the balls, as sperm. The other 95 percent, the “carrier” for sperm, if you will, comes from upper organs, chiefly the prostate and the seminal vessicles.


_______________

avocet8

Well I’m pleased to finally get a few responses to a thread. And a little embarrassed. I read somewhere about how semen is reabsorbed by the body. I’ll take another risk and tell you about an experience I had when taking a human sexuality class. We were talking about abortion and I said how I considered it a form of murder. After the women in the class let me up after a fierce beating I explained that I also considered Male masturbation a form of killing because The male contributes half of the DNA. I know my views are possibly extreme but I feel that not allowing the possibility of fertilization is against God. So now you know what my motivation in not ejaculating is. My betrothed does not believe in pre-marital sex and while I’m far from being a virgin, I would like to at least be able to say that I tried to save all of myself for her. I have no idea what some of you are talking about(you may say the same thing about me) so I’ll have to research what MS zane refers to and the DR. Lin thing. Big D, my spiritual journey is truely wonderful.

Unless a man has developed the ability to extract chi from his seminal fluids, he is diminishing the health of his prostate by maintaining a low frequency of ejaculation over a long period of time.


originally: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG (ms); currently: 9.825" BPEL x 6.825" EG (ms)

Hidden details: Finding xeno: a penis tale; Some photos: Tiger

Tell me, o monks; what cannot be achieved through efforts. - Siddhartha Gautama

I don’t believe in these at all. We all need to ejaculate as we please. Chi, yin-yang, etc. do we live in the 21st century?

Quote
I also considered Male masturbation a form of killing because The male contributes half of the DNA. I know my views are possibly extreme but I feel that not allowing the possibility of fertilization is against God.

I don’t understand that at all. If you believe that then you must believe that menstruation is also a form of killing since an egg contributes half the DNA as well. Sperm you create but do not use will die and be reabsorbed into the body or ejaculated in a wet dream. Your body will release sperm and women’s bodies will menstruate unfertilized eggs whether you want them to or not because that’s how we’re designed (by God or otherwise). Neither sperm nor ova are viable life in and of themselves.Only together can they create life at all.

What will you do on your wedding night if you know your wife isn’t fertile on that day? Will you deny her because you know you would be ejaculating in vain? Will you only engage in sexual activity for the purpose of reproduction? By your definition, anything else, including menstruation and wet dreams, would be murder, and even if you’re only ejaculating for reproductive purposes, a few million sperm will be destroyed in the process. Is it right to murder millions for the hope of one (possibly two) surviving?

Please think this through carefully. I do not believe you have chosen an moral position that can be reconciled on its own arguments.

Originally Posted by ThunderSS

Make your posts easier to read by using paragraphs (they are free, take as many as you need and leave the rest)

Lol lol lol


For our demands most moderate are,

We only want the earth.

James Connolly

[QUOTE=avocet8]
[QUOTE=kaan]
I doubt there is a thing called “backward ejaculation”
You either ejaculate or not. If you don’t, it stays at the balls.

Quote

Consider a Google search of “retrograde ejaculation”; see what you find.

Also, do some reading on male anatomy in general. About 5 percent of total ejaculate comes from the balls, as sperm. The other 95 percent, the “carrier” for sperm, if you will, comes from upper organs, chiefly the prostate and the seminal vessicles.

avocet,

That percent ratio depends. But what’s important is the sperm for me, not the seminal fluid.
I won’t continue this discussion further. But a few more add ons:
Firstly, what xenolith says is of course true: if you’re not sending the power of sperm to the body somehow , not ejaculating will be harmful.
So if you don’t do that, ejaculate. But how much?
I think about once a week or so is would be a good balance to keep the prostate health up and not loose much body power.
Not as much as you can like avocet says :)

And about ejaculating in reverse:
When I suppress my ejaculation during orgasm,my sperm isn’t going to bladder. Where do know that? Because I can have another erection very shortly after, but in case of normal ejaculation, it’s not possible for me. That’s the way I understand that I haven’t lost the sperm.

Thanks, cheers, so on so forth .. :)


Start: 6.9 BPEL x 4.9 (17,5 x 12,5 cm)

Now: 7.7 BPEL x 5.7 (19,5 x 14,5 cm)

I apologize. And here is my offering. First a disclaimer. The Bible says don’t add or take away from the word of God. This is my reasoning, I’m not sure of the validity of it for me and certainly not for you. I’m just trying to find my way to God’s truth. I refer to the creation of Eve in Genesis. She was made from the rib of Adams’. GEN2:23, She shall be called woman for she was taken out of man. And 2:24, For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife and they will become one flesh. Alot of people interpret this verse as an argument against homosexuality. I see it more as a description of fertilization. I don’t know where the soul begins or even if it is composed of part of the soul of a man and a woman. But I wonder. Then there’s Genesis38:9:But Onan knew that the off spring would not be his: so whenever he lay with his brothers wife he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from reproducing offspring for his brother. v.10”What he did was wicked in the Lord’s sight so He put him to death also”. My study bible says this was because Onan refused to fulfill his obligation to his dead brother and his widow. I don’t claim to know the mind of God. Still, I wonder. God acknowledges that men will have discharges of semen in Lev15:16. When a man has a discharge of semen he must bath his whole body with water and he will be unclean until evening. v.18. When a man lies with a woman and there is an emission of semen both must bath with water and they will be unclean till evening. Certainly we know that God wants us to procreate. Because I’m single and want to be closer to God, I would like to limit my times of uncleanness. That said, I ask Thunder, ” How do I separate the script into paragraphs? And thank you for your kindness. I will try to limit my posts to PE related activity.

You take every word in the Bible as truth?

Originally Posted by Jason_Els
I don’t understand that at all. If you believe that then you must believe that menstruation is also a form of killing since an egg contributes half the DNA as well. Sperm you create but do not use will die and be reabsorbed into the body or ejaculated in a wet dream. Your body will release sperm and women’s bodies will menstruate unfertilized eggs whether you want them to or not because that’s how we’re designed (by God or otherwise). Neither sperm nor ova are viable life in and of themselves.Only together can they create life at all.

What will you do on your wedding night if you know your wife isn’t fertile on that day? Will you deny her because you know you would be ejaculating in vain? Will you only engage in sexual activity for the purpose of reproduction? By your definition, anything else, including menstruation and wet dreams, would be murder, and even if you’re only ejaculating for reproductive purposes, a few million sperm will be destroyed in the process. Is it right to murder millions for the hope of one (possibly two) surviving?

Please think this through carefully. I do not believe you have chosen an moral position that can be reconciled on its own arguments.


Well said.

John, you need a rabbinical scholar. For as many religions and sects there are interpretations of these lines.

I state the following based on the premise that God is your creator:

If you say do not add or remove anything from the Bible, then you must also not add or remove from His acts. Consider that it was God who created the sexual process, the organs, the desires, and the bodily functions of menstruation and ejaculation. As such you cannot question the morally of their natural functions. You can question how you choose to use them, but not how they function. To do so is to claim that God created us as murderers. We may sin, but sin comes from acts of our choosing, not of our bodily functions.

I cannot believe that ejaculation or menstruation are sinful based upon this premise. The story of Onan has a very important qualifier. Onan did not masturbate, or at least not with his sister-in-law. He was engaging in copulation but withdrew precisely because he knew the child would not be his. This is the sin. If ejaculation, whether through masturbation or unintended emission, were sinful, then Leviticus would refer to it as such. It does not state that God saw this as evil, indeed, no repentance or act of contrition is required. Bathing is all that is required. If you say do not try to read more nor less into the Bible then this is the required conclusion.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 AM.