A priapism/growth study

Can anyone find the full text of this study?

http://www.ncbi .nlm.nih.gov/en … l=pubmed_DocSum

Don’t you have to be a member to view full texts ?

Search Google for 06Does20040761.pdf for the original file including images (the images are CT and not interseting at all). I cannot link the pdf due to copyright protection. However I citate some of the article.

You can’t cite it without a link

I don’t see why the link found on Google can’t be posted here. The file rests on their webpage.

http://www.smj. org.sa/PDFFiles … oes20040761.pdf

The study refers to prepubertal priapism, so I don’t know how applicable it is. I haven’t read it yet.

He’s right.

Everybody here is waaaay past that stage of development. I hope. :)

What it’s that?? Priapism?>> never heard off

Priapism = an erection that will not subside within a four hour period, technically. At the four hour mark, you begin to worry.

Damn 4 hours, sounds like the disclaimer for the ED drugs at the end of their commercials.

It is.

Priapism is a possible side effect of ED drugs. That’s what they’re talking about at the end of the commercials.

That’s a idiot question but I will do anyway, why this mark, four hours??

Heheeh man that’s some hell of a erection, you could fuck 10 girls easy!

Sometime after 4 hrs of erection, most penises tend to stop circulating blood (arterially and venously) and pool it instead. Result is, penile tissues get less or no oxygen and when that happens, tissue death begins. What that means to you is: Sometime during your doing girl # 10, your cock is dying. :)

As you can imagine, this is a serious condition and requires chemical and/or surgical intervention and can end in a very protracted case of ED.

I think it’s worth noting that the priapism in the study is “high-flow” priapism, which I presume means that the blood is not actually locked in the penis, and that on the contrary, freshly oxygenated blood is coming in at all times. This would remove the major risk of normal priapism. In the single case the doctor reports on, a 13 year old had grown a penis slightly longer and far thicker than most adults after 4 years of having a constant erection. If the same principle could be applied to an adult, this could be promising. Since the doctor seems to regard high-flow priapism as having a straightforward cause, and a simple cure, it might potentially be induceable. (Given that the cause is nerve damage to a specific nerve, this seems dangerous with our current understanding of the nervous system. I fully expect that within the next ten to twenty years we’ll have the undestanding necissary to do this deliberately, though.)