Thunder,,,,,,,,,LOL you mean we “disagree” on something? I don’t
think my words came out as I wanted them too, but anyway. Mabye
what I meant was that the old board had less a “locker room” mentality,
but you are right in that it existed there too. It is hard to compare and
that comment was not the focal point of my post, as you know. Thanks
for pointing it out.
Well said Dashdeming……… there has to be balance. I hope my
“russian roulette” theory is wrong, but I think I am corrrect.
You make very good points.
Ant: yes, you have the right attitude, and that is what I was trying to
convey to Prickle. I see all of us as sort of equals and that was my
point to the non gainers. PE has “other” benefits.
Avocet8: you can pour the martini for me, but you will have to drink it
because I hate martinis.
You are right about that, this board was MARVELOUS last year during my
crushing breakup tragedy, and I thought of that in fact Avocet
when I hit the submit button. I was inundated with empathy and I
shall not forget that.
I did not mean insensitive in that regard, however, but yes, that
is even more important, to help a brother when they are down as I
was—- so I would take that back and reword it. The insensitivity
I meant was restricted only to the “size” issue, not our commeraderie.
——digress: the “spell checker” is not working here——
You are right on that one.
I have thanked you before and I thank you again.
Have I cut enough slack?
Oh, and I AM smelling the roses my friend and they never smelled
better,,,,,,,,,this post was only for the non gainers amongst us, not for
those with relationship problems, so thanks for pointing this out.
Teoman……….I haven’t seen you……………you gained more than I did
in three months, but I had not discovered this board.
Yes I agree with you that there are more slow gainers than fast
gainers (hush Thunder)…….I say that based on the statistics
I have seen but I cannot prove it as I would like. I once
did a long bit of research on the old board where I used some multiple
regression methods to relate gains per hour to factors such as
intensity, time put in, method, etc, and I came up with about five
categories of “gainers.” I was in the next to bottom one, since I did
gain a hair. We did have some “no” gainers but most were “slow” gainers
in terms of inches per hour. I used hours as a common denominator to cut
across the different rountines and varying times per day and number of
sessions per week. I forgot the numbers, but even Bib was not in the
very top group, but he was just behind. I wish I still had that post but
I believe it is gone,,,,,,,,guys used to refer to that as a benchmark.
Most slow gainers work and work but do not post as much I think. Some
leave having never said a word. I, Bib, and Big Al once caculated that
non-gainers are anywhere from 2% to 4% of all PEers. But how do
we define a non-gainer?……….some quit after a year or so.
I know a frequent poster here who has been at it for three years and seveal months
with NO gains and he works hard. He is popular. He also never complains
and is one of “us.” He will work until one day one could say he is or is not, but
he has the right attitude.
Back to my rose bed.