Cellular Growth Hypothesis
Hypothesis: The decrease in length and girth gains after the initial gains, is the product of a constant cellular growth, which masks the results because of the two dimensional measurement techniques.
Translation: Since we measure length and width instead of total volume we see a decrease in gains because as our member gets bigger it takes more volume to fill the larger package, therefore we must have more cellular growth per unit of measure.
Assumptions:
1. Cellular growth causes the increase in size of the penis.
2. The penis is cylindrical. (For calculation purposes)
Ok, lets start by taking our first measurements. 5.5” BPEL 4.5”EG looks good for a beginner. Now, lets figure his volume (assuming his penis is cylindrical) using the formula :
V= 3.1416 r2 h (Pi times r squared times h)
V is volume
r is the radius of penis
h is the length of penis (BPEL)
First we must find the radius of our penis. Using the girth measurement and the formula
C = 2 pi r
C = circumference (EG)
pi = 3.1416
r = radius of penis
When rearranged the formula becomes:
r = C / 6.2832
r = 4.5” / 6.2832
r = 0.7162”
Now back to our original formula:
V = 3.1416 r2 h
V = 3.1416( (0.7162)(0.7162)) (5.5)
V = 8.8630 cubic inches
Right about now I am wondering if this is the method used to figure the size of a porn stars penis.
Sure would explain a lot, maybe someone else can investigate that theory, I know DLD has written extensively on the subject.
Now how is this information useful? Well if we compare the amount of increase in volume to go from 4.5” EG to 4.6” EG we get the following:
From above V = 8.8630 cubic inches at 5.5 BPEL and 4.5 EG
At 5.5 BPEL and 4.6 EG
r = 4.6 / 6.2832 = 0.7321”
V = 3.1416 ((0.7321) (0.7321)) (5.5) = 9.2609 cubic inches
This is an increase of 0.3979 cubic inches of “cellular growth”.
Now lets try the same 0.1 increase in EG measurement on a person who has already had significant gains and is at a nice size of 5.0” EG and 6.5”BPEL.
At 5.5” EG and 6.5” BPEL
r = 5.5 / 6.2832 = 0.8754”
V = 3.1416( (0.8754)(0.8754))(6.5)=15.6487 cubic inches
At 5.6” EG and 6.5” BPEL
r = 5.6 / 6.2832 = 0.8912”
V = 3.1416 ((0.8912)(0.8912))(6.5)=16.2186 cubic inches
This is an increase of 0.5699 cubic inches or “cellular growth”.
Now lets take this same 0.1 increase in EG measurement on a person with a 6.0” EG and
8.0” BPEL.
At 6.0” EG and 8.0” BPEL
r = 6.0 /6.2832 = 0.9549”
V = 3.1416 ((0.9549)(0.9549)) (8.0) = 22.9169 cubic inches
At 6.1” EG and 8.0” BPEL
r = 6.1/6.2832 = 0.9708”
V = 3.1416 ((0.9704)(0.9704)) (8.0) = 23.6670 cubic inches
This is an increase of 0.7501 cubic inches of “cellular growth”.
What about length gains? Lets try this same strategy using the 0.1” gain in BPEL.
At 5.5”BPEL and 4.5” EG.
From above V = 8.8630 cubic inches.
At 5.6” BPEL and 4.5” EG
r = 4.5 /6.2832” = 0.7162”
V = 3.1416 ((0.7162)(0.7162)) (5.6) = 9.0240 cubic inches
Which is a difference of 0.161 cubic inches of “cellular growth”.
At 6.5” BPEL and 5.5” EG
From above V=15.6487 cubic inches.
At 6.6” BPEL and 5.5” EG
r = 5.5/6.2832= 0.8754”
V = 3.1416 ((0.8754)(0.8754)) (6.6) = 15.8889 cubic inches.
Which is a difference of 0.2402 cubic inches of “cellular growth”.
At 8.0” BPEL and 6.0” EG
r = 6.0 /6.2832 = 0.9549”
V = 3.1416 ((0.9549)(0.9549)) (8.0) = 22.9169 cubic inches
At 8.1” BPEL and 6.0” EG
r = 6.0/6.2832 = 0.9549”
V = 3.1416 ((0.9549)(0.9549)) (8.1) = 23.2034 cubic inches
This is an increase of 0.2865 cubic inches of “cellular growth”.
**** NOTE: This hypothesis makes no compensation for the increase in length acquired from a repositioning of the penis from inside the body to outside the body. ****
Now lets use both BPEL and EG gains together to see the amount of “cellular growth” to increase size by 0.1” in each measurement.
I will spare you the details of the calculations and just show the results.
At 5.5” BPEL and 4.5” EG V = 8.8630 cubic inches.
At 5.6” BPEL and 4.6” EG V = 9.4293 cubic inches.
A difference of 0.5663 cubic inches of cellular growth.
At 6.5” BPEL and 5.5” EG V = 15.6487 cubic inches
At 6.6” BPEL and 5.6” EG V = 16.4862 cubic inches
A difference of 0.8375 cubic inches of cellular growth.
At 8.0” BPEL and 6.0” EG V = 22.9169 cubic inches
At 8.1” BPEL and 6.1” EG V = 23.9826 cubic inches
A difference of 1.0567 cubic inches of cellular growth.
Now how can we use this information to help us all in our pursuit of the perfect size?
Well first of all, (with the assumption that our cellular growth stays constant during our PE career) we can now see that as we progress and see an increase in our measurements, we can understand that larger members must have more cellular growth for each increase in BPEL and EG measurement.With this in mind we should expect that our gains will come slower using BPEL and EG measurement as we get larger, therefore we should wait a longer interval between measurements.
Due to the inherent inaccuracy of the two dimensional measurement and the limited precision of the measuring devices, it would be possible to see an apparent loss of size, if measurements are taken too frequently.
I do not claim to be an expert nor do I make any claim as to the validity or accuracy of any calculations in this post. I simply offer this information as an interesting observation of the mechanics and geometry involved in PE.
It would be interesting to see a study done to see if cellular growth is indeed constant. This would allow a person who has had a significant gain to calculate his own rate of cellular growth and to estimate the length of time required to reach his next goal. Allowing him to schedule his “official” measurement times to coincide with reaching his expected goal.
If however we change our routine to possibly increase the rate of cellular growth that would allow us to reach our goals sooner. This may explain the need for persons with some growth to progress to more intense workouts to see and increase in size.
Thank you for reading this post and please feel free to make comments about it. As I said I do not claim to be an expert.
I_want_8