Circumfrence shape MATTERS!!!

I wonder if it would be possible to grow a square penis the same way the Japanese do with watermelons. That would be fun/weird to see. I wonder if there is anyone crazy enough to try!

A cross section of my unit at the widest point would be - half an ellipse on top and more of a rounded boat hull ‘V” shape on the botom half. Great for riding the waves of pleasure.

dkp

I have thought of doing that before. When I get some more time, I may go ahead!!!!!

Gimli

Yes I was also considering this. Accuracy would be difficult to attain.

You could just use a graduated cylinder, and mark a line for water height before you put your penis in, and then after.

Gimli

What is interesting is that the shape of a circle results in the biggest area for a given circumference as mentioned earlier on this thread. That would mean that in order to have a large circumference compared to cross-sectional area (ie.relatively low cross-sectional area) one would pursue in growing a very elliptical penis. This is only if surface area is wanted to be gained with minimum requirements for actual tissue growth (chamber tissue growth). Surface area is wanted because it in turn stimulate a greater surface area within the vagina. So the best way to increase girth if you want to minimize the need to grow more tissue (except tunica tissue of course) is to increase the width as appose to the depth of the penis. But then again seeing as the tunica probably limits girth gains increasing the penis depth is probably easier as it won’t increase circumference as much as it is giving the penis a more “perimeter-sparing” or “circumference-sparing” shape which is circular, as a circle will have maximum area with minimum perimeter. So if you want to minimize the need to stretch the tunica (as this is hard apparently) then you could increase the depth of your penis which should happen more easily than increasing width, yet will require more tissue growth as it results in a greater increase in volume than if the same girth gains where due to increased width. Hope that made some sense!

I recently posted on this. The theory that there is more area to be had from a true circle to true ellipse is False I believe, assuming you are looking at both axises. Also the thought that any calculation can be based on this would also be false. The coefficient or value to calculate size based on diameter would not be 3.14 nor would the equation for an ellipse be accurate since the shape is not mathematically defined by these shapes. In fact, it would almost certainly be somewhere between the square and the circle (closer to circle) and have some obscure value like 3.25R(squared). A lot of people screw up the calculation for Diameter by crushing themselves with a ruler as studies put the average between 1.25-1.55 for diameter. That said, it would be great to add more circular shape by adjusting routine if that is possible.

Thought it was obvious.

My MSEG is bigger than base girth and head girth so to calculate my volume by using MSEG would be incorrect. If ever had any interest in calculating my volume I think base girth would be the best since even if it’s not accurate, I’ll know I’m not below that

Yeah, I’m just saying that a lot of people have mentioned using diameter and depth as if they can calculate their size from it and you can’t. Almost all dicks fall within that range of circle/ellipse and square/rectangle almost always falling CLOSER to a circle/ellipse, but it’s still not very accurate. Long story short- they should really look at volume in studies. As the original author posted, this can vary greatly depending on shape. I don’t know- Maybe this is obvious to everyone, haven’t been around in a while haha!

You can increase the cross sectional area in the vagina very easily by changing the angle of penetration in whichever dimension you desire. Technique trumps shape here

With respect to possessing average girth, it may be more pleasurable for your partner if you have a greater diameter on the X-axis than Y. This would give the girl the feeling of being more stretched in one dimension.
If your penis doesn’t have such shape than you can get this with the help of medication.
You can buy it from the market or online.
Ref link -
Thanks

:spam:

My opinion is that an oval or circular penis shaft is irrelevant. What you want is a thicker penis, one with greater diameter, greater girth as that penis will grip the vagina and create a suction effect which will end up moving everything else, labia, clitoral hood. A narrow penis that just pocks in and out does nothing much for your friend except your weight on her vulva.

I cannot see how technique can compensate for a thick, grasping erect penis.

.. this.

I saw that comment and thought the same thing.
Changing angles with a pencil will never trump a good ol’ fashioned “fill ‘er up!” right down the middle with a cucumber.
Gotta move her to groove her, and moving her insides around is what makes them O’s blow.
Yes.. she can come from a well placed finger on her G spot.. but she will come every time when her side and back walls are squeezing a good sized cock against that G spot basically every time he passes by.

Gotta get them gals to kegel that thing!

good luck out there fellas,
SVP

.. no disrespect intended to the ‘technique’ poster.
Just stating a real life observation based on over 37 years experience.

SVP

No disrespect perceived.

I guess I was making the point that by changing the angle you also change the cross sectional area at the entrance - like when you stick a screwdriver in the wall then wiggle it around to make the hole bigger. Or alternatively, cut a banana perpendicular then again at an angle - the angular cut will have more cross-sectional area because one axis will be longer.

I agree that there is no substitute for size. However with my own 4 odd decades of experience, including swinging regularly mixed into that at times, I have found that often (depending on the woman) you can do more with less than you can with more. I’m not huge by standards here but in the swinging world I am often not using all of what I have out of consideration for the many ladies who are used to more average sizes. If they need more than I have I can always add a finger … Or sometimes … Another cock.