Deep Voice Equals Big Dick?

Ronnie Coleman’s pecker and voice would confirm that correlation.

Really?

Height vs. Length vs. Girth Project

Height vs. weenie

Shoe size vs. penis length

http://www.size … com/result.html

Looked around the web some just now and haven’t had any luck finding any studies on voice vs penis size. Another interesting correlation was posted here not too long ago - a connection that isn’t typically considered.

Big Butt Big Dick.

There must be someone here who has heard footage of John Holmes talking. Did he have a deep voice or not?

I’ve got two examples, me and a friend of mine, that are quite confusing.

My mate is 21, he’s got a deep booming voice, quite tall (6 foor 1) and very broad-shouldered, size 11 feet, big facial features - but fairly small hands and narrow wrists, no body hair and almost no facial hair, until very recently he shaved like once every three days (he’s white European so it’s not an Asian thing). He’s got a massive flaccid - the biggest I’ve ever seen. Never seen him erect but he says he’s about 7.5 by 6, though judging from all his bragging about the blow-jobs he’s getting he must be a bit less than what he claims in girth.

Myself, I’m 6 foor 3, broad-shouldered, size 10 feet, but fairly high-pitched voice, also very little facial hair, and I was about 6.5 by 5.5 pre-PE. Go figure.

I don’t know if there’s a corellation here, but as the father of an 11 year old boy who’s the second shortest boy in his fifth grade class, I’m starting to wonder about adolescent growth. My son has a relatively high voice. I don’t know how big his penis is relative to other boys his age.

Is there an endocrinologist, and maybe a geneticist, in the house?

I recall from biology class that testosterone during puberty and adolescence spurs both the growth of the sex organs and the deepening of the voice in boys.

So, if both phallic development and larynx/vocal fold development are both stimulated by the presence of the same hormone — testosterone — there could be some correlation.

Growth hormone deficiency appears to correllate with high male voices. I’m not seeing much in searches about the role of GH in phallic development, although I remember seeing the idea discussed here.

There. That should be enough off the top of my head to compel people who know more to set me straight.

At the extremes there may be a correlation. Very high voices in men may correlate with hormonal problems which also affect penile growth, but I don’t think there’s much of a connection in developmentally normal guys.

My father has a beautiful barritone voice. But, unfortunately, I inherited his dick :( .

Why the hell do you know how big Ronnie Coleman’s schlong is?

I have a fairly deep voice, and have received a lot of compliments on it, but I was only 5” NBPEL by 5.5” EG before PE. I also have small hands (my GF’s are the same size), small feet and not a lot of facial hair. I can grow a mustache and a chin beard but can’t connect a goatee of have a full beard since it comes in all patchy. Am 5’ 8” tall and 145 lbs. My father was shorter than me but hung like horse.

Though semi-related at best, it might answer your question about what you perceive as masculine gender-wise.

Hearing Changes How We Perceive Gender

ScienceDaily (Oct. 25, 2007) — Think about the confused feelings that occur when you meet someone whose tone of voice doesn’t seem to quite fit with his or her gender. A new study by neuroscientists from Northwestern University focuses on the brain’s processing of such sensory information about another’s gender to examine whether hearing fundamentally changes visual experience.

The study concludes that it does, weighing in with findings that contribute to provocative evidence about multi-sensory processing of our world that has been emerging in recent years.

"Researchers have long thought that one part of the brain does vision and another does auditory processing and that the two really don’t communicate with each other," said Marcia Grabowecky, one of the researchers with Northwestern University.

"But emerging research suggests that rich information from different senses come together quickly and influence each other so that we don’t experience the world one sense at a time."

The Northwestern study* suggests that sensory interactions are happening at a very early level and tones of voices indeed fundamentally change visual processing.

"For our study, we used simple tones with no explicit gender information to get a window into how vision and audition work together to process gender information," Grabowecky said. "Unlike stereotypical voices, the tones only hinted at male and female characteristics, and by coupling them with ambiguous faces, we were able to see how processing of various pitches affected vision very early in the sensory process."

The study builds upon scarce scientific evidence supporting the idea that sounds can alter how masculine or feminine a person looks.

"Our vision can bias our experience of other senses, such as hearing," said Smith. "We hear, for example, the ventriloquist’s voice coming from the dummy. In this study we wanted to see if hearing could change our visual experience."

"We learn early on what auditory and visual characteristics accompany female and male voices, starting with our earliest experiences with our mothers and fathers," said Grabowecky. "The question from the neuroscience perspective is when in the processing of perceptual information do auditory and visual senses interact with each other? How does the brain do this?"

To test whether a sound can influence perception of a face’s gender, the researchers digitally morphed male and female faces to create androgynous faces not easily categorized as male or female. Study participants were asked to look at the faces while listening to brief auditory tones, which fell within the fundamental speaking frequency range of either male or female voices.

In the initial stage of auditory processing, sounds are decomposed into basic frequency components, the lowest one called the fundamental frequency and higher ones called the harmonics. The fundamental frequency in the human voice typically falls between about 100 to 150 Hz for males and 160 to 300 Hz for females. Roughly speaking, the fundamental frequency determines the perceived pitch (lower for men and higher for women), and the harmonics add timbre (the quality of human voice).

In higher auditory brain areas, these frequencies are put back together to be coded as a human voice. The researchers took advantage of the fact that pure tones can be used to deliver individual frequency components that are registered in early auditory brain areas.

The findings showed that when an androgynous face was paired with a pure tone that fell within the female fundamental-frequency range, people were more likely to report that the ambiguous face was that of a female. But when the same face was paired with a pure tone in the male fundamental-frequency range, people were more likely to see a male face. (The bias did not occur when a face was paired with a pure tone that was too low or too high to be in the typical speaking range.)

"The strength of the study is that pure tones sound like beeps, and they primarily activate early stages of auditory processing," Grabowecky said. "We think that the effect demonstrates a direct input from early auditory processing to visual perception."

When people were forced to guess whether the tones were in the male range, the female range or outside of the typical speaking frequency range, their guesses were inaccurate and relative. In other words, when people heard a pair of pure tones, they tended to hear the higher tone to be feminine and the lower tone to be masculine regardless of the actual frequencies of the tones.

"Such relativity is not surprising, because our auditory experience depends on relative, rather than absolute, frequencies as most useful and entertaining auditory information, such as speech and music, is carried by how sound frequencies change over time," Grabowecky said.

Absolute frequencies do not matter much, as we readily understand speech spoken by people with low and high voices and enjoy songs regardless of the keys in which they are played. In contrast, it is the "neglected" absolute-frequency information that influences visual perception of gender.

"A conscious impression of your voice is not what enhances your look of masculinity or femininity," said Satoru Suzuki, also of Northwestern. "Sounds seem to influence visual gender in a much more fundamental way on the basis of their absolute frequencies processed in early auditory brain areas."

The researchers focused on gender perception, because people have such a strong need to categorize people as male or female. "We all know the feeling of meeting a person who is very androgynous," said Eric Smith, lead author. "We simply need to know and will use any information at our disposal to identify a person’s gender. It is probably quite evolutionarily adaptive to be able to accurately tell males from females, as far as propagation of one’s genes is concerned."

What is on the horizon?

"If sound can implicitly bias visual gender perception, then we need to consider whether other senses, such as smell, might yield similar effects," said Smith. "Future studies might use masculine and feminine colognes, or even human pheromones to bias people to see androgynous faces as either male or female. With the possibility of other senses biasing the way that we see the world, our visual experience of gender might turn out to be much more than meets the eye."

*Reference: "Auditory-Visual Cross-Modal Integration in Perception of Face Gender," was published in a recent issue of Current Biology. The study’s co-authors are investigators at Northwestern’s Visual Perception, Cognition and Neuroscience Laboratory: lead author Eric Smith, graduate student, Marcia Grabowecky, research assistant professor of psychology, and Satoru Suzuki, associate professor of psychology.

Adapted from materials provided by Northwestern University.

Hearing Changes How We Perceive Gender — ScienceDaily

I have a very deep voice, and I have about an average size dick. I am about 6-6.25 in. BP and I about 5.25 in. NBP which is what I use for my measurements.

Its funny,I always thought a deep voice meant big balls!!! Nothing to do with dick size!

That’s now. When I started I was slightly less than six inches, which my wife said was small.

I found this on a german website:

“Männer mit einer Stimmtiefe von 90 Hertz nannten im Durchschnitt 2 Kinder mehr ihr Eigen als Männer mit einer Stimmhöhe von 160 Hertz.

Testosteron als Zaubermittel

Die Erklärung: Ein hoher Testosteronspiegel verdickt und verlängert die Stimmbänder eines Mannes, sie vibrieren auf einer niedrigeren Frequenz. Die Stimme eines Mannes ist in der Folge tiefer. Zugleich verkörpert ein Mann mit hohen Testosteronwerten für die Frau einen exzellenten Jäger, sprich, einen guten Versorger. Die tiefe Stimme fungiert somit als Indikator für gute Versorgereigenschaften. Aufgrund der Evolution bevorzugen auch moderne Frauen immer noch Männer mit tiefer Stimme.”

They say that testosterone thickens and makes a man’s vocal chords longer and so deepens his voice.
So I would guess there is a slight correlation between deep voice and bigger balls.

I changed my voice with the time, getting a deeper voice. You only have to exercise a bit. ;)

Just check out a bunch of porn videos.

I can think of at least a few porn stars who won’t have deep voices but who do have pretty big dicks… Peter North… Rocco… Manual Ferrera… Brandon Iron.

I’d say Manual Ferrera and Brandon Iron’s voice are actually relatively high.