Originally Posted by ssa5522
Hey guys! Finally I’ll try again to send my results!Pay attention to everything I wrote. I included some fun calculators, try them and compare your size!
This doesn’t include the last measurements inputed which I will include later on when I get to a higher number of participants.
Hope you like it.
A survey which includes the spanish speaking community of thunders coming soon.
File
I have not seen the latest stats, but dug this one out from 2008.
Despite many variations (short guy with a big one, or a tall guy with a small one), I am still inclined to believe that height and penis length is somehow correlated. If evolutionary is of any indication of penis size, then it does make sense to see this correlation.
This is why I am still a believer that Asian guys, on a greater average, have smaller penises than Caucasians.
I was born in Taiwan (Chinese Asians). The average build (height, weight and body frame) is smaller than both Caucasians and Blacks. Even with proper diet, most Chinese Asians are built on average smaller than say, Blacks in Africa who suffer from mal-nutrition. So diet is only a small variable, which means genes play the majority of differences in penis size.
If you ever watch Japanese, Chinese, Viet and Thai porn, you will find that most porn actors are smaller than Caucasian and Black porn stars. If it was somewhat true that porn industry would hire male actors with plus sizes, why would the Asian porn actors are smaller? I would say 6” x 5” would consider fairly large in Asian porn films (and with small body structure, a true 6x5 can easily been seen as 7x6). And of course, Black porn industry is the most biased in terms of who they hire to perform since there’s such a stereotype about BBC (Big Black Cock).
I believe penis size may have something to do with the type of culture one’s ancestor was in. Let me give you an example. A typical stereotype is that Chinese Asians and Indian Asians are said to have the smallest penis size among all races. It could be true if one analyzes about the type of culture that China and India was in: far more populated agriculture society. So the success of one’s ancestor is not really based on physical build (bigger body, bigger penis etc); in fact, a success of an Asian family is based on the interrelationships with his/her surroundings. It is imperial to stay alive by being a smarter thinker? better businessman?
In Comparison, Caucasian cultures were a mix of agriculture and hunting society. In hunting society, one has to be physically strong enough to fight and to bring food to the domestic females. Perhaps throughout history, those who were more physically fit also happened to have larger size penises. And they tended to have more offsprings because the women were more attracted to those who could bring them food and security. On the other hand, a greater part of Caucasian culture was agriculture, so the same Asian theory may apply to these groups of Whites (hence the greater variations among Caucasians). Mind you, Caucasians also have the most cross-racial offsprings than any other race. So the result is very complicated.
Lastly, there are ancestors of Blacks who live and have lived in Africa. Africa is the most challenging continent to survive in. In order to live, the males have to be extremely fit to fight the wild animals and withstand the extreme dry, hot weather. So it is possible that throughout the history, the males who were stronger, were also more physically fit (larger body frame, larger legs, bigger penises). Perhaps Black women were inclined to choose mates who could put food on the table; as result, more offsprings were produced from survival of the fittest perspective.