If woman prefer a bigger dick than why am I small?

Yes, objectively you are right… The large ass just gives a woman the impression of needing a larger cock, thus reducing my confidnece some.

For me the larger assed girls have been my tightest, every time.

As far as asses go, I don’t think a fatter ass requires a fatter cock, but I think it requires a longer cock if you intend to go doggie style. A fat ass can add another inch or two or more (depending how fat the ass) of flesh between you and her vagina.

Yes, you are completely correct. I find my “short one” just about useless, well , at least, too embarrassingly problematic to “go doggie style”. If my PE is successful, I will certainly be giving doggie a try as many women have requested it over the years.

Genetics

You also need to realize that women up until the last 50 years have had little to say about whom they were breading with. Men used to be far more dominant.

Hi everyone.

I am new here, but from my knowledge, a large penis size hasn’t always been a popular attribute. For example, in ancient Greece, a large penile size was considered ‘laughable’ (just look at the statue of David)

To be deadly honest, having a large penis is more of a modern trend.

But don’t get me wrong guys, I’m still up for gaining a few inches!

I’d really like to know the source and documentation for this information. I’ve heard this several times, but no one ever gives a source. Surely, one Greek ancient writer (probably a philosopher) wouldn’t prove much. It might just indicate an “intellectual” reaction against the common preference for large which “philosophers” might consider primitive and/or animalistic, not “refined” and not really represent a societal consensus. I’d be surprised if the large penis was not ALWAYS a popular attribute except for “small” sub-cultures.

The statue of “David” was by Michael Angelo during the Italian Renaissance if I recall correctly. The prudish “Church Fathers” would tolerate nudity in art in that period, but I am sure they insisted that sexuality be downplayed for statues displayed in public, thus the small penis on David. Also, “David” might be perceived as a “sex object” for more masculine, older males. Current day Italians do not have the reputation for admiring small peni.

I am not sure that all or most really ancient statues from Greece displayed “small peni”. I am told the Romans admired and even worshipped large powerful peni and had huge statues of them erect toward the rising of the “sun god” on some island … And on many statues all defaced by Christians in later centuries. The Romans also disparaged Greeks for their indulgence in homosexuality, but, of course, saw nothing wrong with Romans taking the dominant, penetrating position with another man or boy, often slaves and captives (Greeks?).

It is important to remember who exactly these ancient Greeks were having sex with and in which aperture. The ancient Greeks—the upper classes—were having relationships with teenage boys, and indeed considered this the ‘ideal’ form of relationship. Small was indeed beautiful. See Burckhardt’s ‘The Greeks and Greek Civilization.’ But keep in mind that the Greeks kept women like chattel. In this sense they were more like many eastern cultures than our own. Women were not even allowed to watch sporting events—which were performed in the nude—for reasons of an insecurity which we here at Thunder’s understand so well. They didn’t want their women gettin big ideas.
The David like all sculpture from the Renaissance period took its cue from Greco-Roman statuary that was being unearthed, studied, and copied at that time of reemerging humanism.

That being said, it is important to consider that we as a species may have reached an equilibrium on the wang size issue. Perhaps bigger is not leading to greater production of offspring at all. Indeed, perhaps the biggest gents and those women who prefer them become so encumbered by disease or so adverse to to idea of ruining their sex lives by having kids to deal with that they become maladaptive and fail to propagate altogether. Look at the sad demise of poor John Holmes.

But I stretch it nonetheless…

Interesting… Like Muslim Fundamentalists of today? The morons at Abu Grave(sp) were apparently trying to mess with their minds over this issue.

Ha ha ha, BIG ideas.

I have not read through this whole thread so I may be repeating what someone else said. But How can you say that average guy would be out of existence? I mean there will always be an average in general right? Who is to say that natural selection didn’t take into effect like you said and before the average dick size was like 4 inches or something? We don’t really have evidence of that. Just saying what you are saying is pretty subjective. Also just because people have a preference does not mean it will not go on. Natural selection is simple. If you breed your genes go on. Simple as that. I doubt penis size really has that much meaning when it comes to the species as a whole in natural selection.

I don’t really care about female’s perspective or preference on penis size. It is your penis, and you have to know what you want. OK.

The term is Lamarckism. Sorry I don’t know why I felt the need to reply to a five year old post.

Lol why is the sky blue daddy?