hugh,
I agree with you - BPEL is definitely “useable” size. When I’m grinding passionately, I am no doubt countersinking my cock far below that soft, yielding fatpad.
I measure BP for erect, NBP for flaccid - for just that reason. And when it comes to flaccid, it is what you see. But erect is the money measurement, and when I’m screwing I sure don’t stop on skin contact!
shiver,
I feel the same way. I’m about 1/4” longer than you and your words basically described my own thoughts about my tool.
Para,
I do believe that we often look at the world through PE-colored glasses; nonetheless, I do believe that we can draw some fair assumptions or opinions about cock size.
Personally, I would not describe my cock as huge (I don’t know if this contains vestiges of my less-than-satisfactory flaccid size, or simply seeing a lot of porn over the years, etc.). But in my honest opinion, I think a guy should be 8+ (nbp) x 6+ (mid) before he could consider himself huge. And I would say that is a huge-looking dick (and most women would certainly agree). But if you’re talking about 6.5, 7, 7.24, BP, etc., you’re really just arguing with the ruler. A big dick speaks for itself, loud & clear.
And I would agree with you that girth offers the most immediate, dramatic statement for a “big dick” (especially width over simply girth). A guy could be 6+ x 6 and most women would say he’s bigger than a 7.5 x 5 (and that’s without their having any knowledge of volumetric readings, etc.). And a fat cock just looks “stronger” and opens up a woman more than a thinner cock.
As the now-infamous “Dr. Bitch” had mentioned, “Most guys just focus on length, but women care about girth. I love girth!” (apparently her buckeye didn’t feel the same way). :)