length from jelqs
I think it is commonly excepted that 70% erect jelqs increase length, whilst 100% erect jelqs don’t.
I have been considering whether one would get even more length gain if the erection level was less than 70%. If 70% gives more length gains than 90%, why wouldn’t 50% give more length gains than 70%. Or for that matter, why wouldn’t 0% erect stretching give more length gains than jelqing at any level of erection?
Are we to presume that the length gains will be increased further the less erect the penis is? Are we also to presume that jelqing increases length by the identical mechanics that occur from stretching the tunica whilst flaccid and that there is no extra beneficial mechanics from being partially erect, or sliding blood forwards, that might aid length gains, ontop of the tunica stretching which is taking place, in the identical way that occurs from flaccid tunica stretches? Is the partial erection infact lessening the length gains due to there being less stretchability in the penis? Are the partial erections and the sliding of blood forwards, souly beneficial for the girth alone?
Is there anything about having partial erections or sliding blood forwards that is able to contribute to length gains when pulling/jelqing on the dick, or is the occurance of partial erections just hindering the stretch and lengthening potential from the pulling/jelqing?
There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world: and that is an idea whose time has come.