Monster cock phenomenon

I think a man would have to be uncommonly small—say, 2-3 inches—for it to be called a “deficiency.” I believe the vast majority of men fall within the range of 5-6 inches. The percentages start dropping radically for every 1/4 inch above or below that, to the point where anything above 8” inches or so, and anything below 4” or so becomes exceedingly rare. What does that tell us? It tells us that the most functional, all-purpose unit for humans, from an evolutionary perspective, is between 5 and 6 inches. And that’s because that is the range of sizes that best fits the average range of human vaginae.

So a man with a inordinately large “monster” unit could be said equally to have a “defect” (or at least an abnormality) as a man with an unusually small one, from an evolutionary perspective. And it probably takes just as much love for a woman to deal with a really big one as a really small one.

I only bring this up because I get the impression that a lot of guys think that average is inadequate, or small. And as much as we may feel that way subjectively, it’s just not objectively true.

We should run a Genesis project, where the guy with the biggest penis mates with a sexy blond with huge breasts.
Thus more endowed males will walk the earth. ;)

Actually, you would want to get a guy with the huge penis mate with a woman who’s father/brothers/cousins have huge penises.

Carrying further, you would want the son/s to repeat the process with his mate and the daughters to mate with hugely hung men and so on and so forth for succeeding generations.

Interestingly, this phenomena may happen a few times if porn stars/actresses marry each other and keep family in the business.

On the flipside, would suck hardcore to be the average/small penis son with the hugely hung pornstar father/grandfather/brother/s.

The thinking is that chimps have big nuts because of promiscuity. You out compete your rivals by delivering more sperm.

Gorillas appear absurdly small, genitally speaking, because the alpha male has no competition during his prime. Hence, he’s packing only what’s necessary to get the job done.

Humans fall in between with respect to testicle size, as we can be described as intermediate in terms of promiscuity relative to chimps and gorillas. Our outsized penises may be a result of female selection during evolutionary time. Upright man has his package “out there” all the time. The vanishingly small presence of seriously large penises, such as the mythical ten-incher, suggests that there has been little or no evolutionary pressure toward that extreme. You won’t serve well as a conduit for your genes if sex with you is a miserable experience for the typical woman.

Humans have the largest primate willy because of the more internal nature of the human vagina. There in an interesting theory about the evolution of humans that points out that our reproductive organs and our heating the body through fat rather than hair shares much in common with aquatic mamals.

As far as natural selection goes, it is more important for males to have psychological characteristics that make them a good defender and provider for the family. Looks are a tertiary concern with women and that is genetic, just like it is genetic that men go for looks and are attracted to women with a certain hip to waiste proportion (which just happens to be the ratio that favours easier birth.) These subconscious factors are beyond our control, however, as our social environment effects our “needs” more and more it will be interesting to see, overtime, how that will effect our geneticly decided behavior.(I’m going to live forever just so I can see it!) You have to remember that at the beginning of the 20th century we were still much more controlled by natural environmental factors. By the 60s we had mostly isolated ourselves from any natural conditions and only the third world countries lack that isolation. In the absence of natural environmental factors, social environmental factors can greatly effect evolution. It has happened in human (pre)history before and it could happen again.

Exactly, nothing ruins an intergenerational incestuous gay orgie like penis size jealousy.

Up until I settled down with one man for a while I played the field quite a bit. You’ll hear of some gay guys claiming thousands of contacts and for some it’s true. My numbers are barely into three digits.

I met this one guy from Kentucky who was truly the diameter of a soda can. That’s an 8 inch girth. I got hold of a monster in New Orleans once at Mardi Gras. He was nearly that wide and considerably longer (8.5” or so, it was dark :) ). Those are the two really fat ones in over 100 contacts. I’ve generally been the longer one in most of my encounters and before PE I was 7”. There have been only three or four that were impressively longer (8” or more) that I can remember.

I think many claims of extreme length are due to inaccuracies in measurement. There are some extraordinary ones, but they are few and far between. Can’t say what causes them, but I’d lean toward mutations rather than any specific genetic trait.

I’ve posted before about a chick I hooked up with in a one night stand that while in bed started talking about a guy she had to make stop just three weeks earlier. She demonstrated with her fingers at least 8” of girth. She said he became very upset and told her she was the third one in a row to make him stop (or she may have said his last three women before her which would make it four in a row - my memory is a bit foggy on that detail). It’s a bit wierd that I could still feel a bit of jealousy even though it prevented them from continuing intercourse. Her saying they had to stop helped to give credit to her story as it was evident she wasn’t trying to rub my face in it but merely wanted to talk about it since it was so unusual to see a penis that thick. She wasn’t the least bit tight to me and that induced the bit of jealousy I felt. If they hadn’t have stopped then my jealousy level would have been much higher, of course.