My dick is the thickest thinnest thing ever....

As was said, width is more visually impressive - but I don’t understand by what you mean that it might “matter more to women than depth.” Obviously, the penis is cylindrical in shape, posessing a volumetric mass. When this mass is inserted into a vagina, it will displace it’s volume within there. As Joystick succinctly said, “Cocks come in various shapes my friend but a 6” girth is always a 6” inch girth no matter how it visually compares to other cocks.”

I think a wide cock might feel upon first entrance a bit bigger, since it has to really spread open those lips. The vagina seems like it may be able to take depth easier.

Philadelph,
That’s like saying 5 lbs of stone is heavier than 5 lbs of feathers. While a 6” girth that is wide will spread wider, it will spread less deeply. A 6” girth that is narrower will be spreading more up and down.

A cock that is 8 x 6 is still roughly 23 ci, regardless of how close it’s circumference is to a pure circle. The displacement value is still the same, and the mouth of the pussy is still spreading around 6” of circumference.

Can we get a little more technical? It sounds like replacing the oil pump in a Volvo (Vulva)!!

WAD I think I understand what he is saying - imagine the opening in skeletal terms. The pelvic ring is not as wide, sideways, as it is deep. The asshole etc occupies the extra opening space, but can easily be pushed out of the way, whereas a wide cock would press almost to the bone.

Eg, you are pressing more against the bone than just displacing flesh, so it might feel different.

Although 8x6” in any configuration is still the same volume, I think that width actually can make a difference. To understand why you need to know how the clitoris is built. The visible part of the clitoris is pretty much the tip of the iceberg; the actual body of the “organ” goes up slightly above the pubic bone and there are also two “leg-like” threads running alongside the labia. A wider dick might affect that part of the clitoris more and that can’t be bad.

Yea not a bad idea to keep a width measurement really

I’m with Tox. Take a pic and then compare.

You guys may be right - since I lack a vagina, I can’t say first hand. But as the clitoris sit atop the vaginal opening, would a wider cock bring it down against the shaft, or would a deeper cock stimulate it more vigorously?

Where’s that whacko from that website? Maybe that could be his next project - experimenting with dildos of equal girth, but varying width on his “female subjects,” while recording their responses.

I’ll say this - width certainly looks better. But I know that my wife has often found it slow going with my girth - making her snatch feel extremely snug, even when quite wet.

Since Wad here obviously didn’t care to read my post above I’ll quote myself:

Check any good anatomy text or book and you should find the same information.

Alright then, to answer a question, what WIDTH of the penis do you think is optimal for stimulating the clitoris? Of course it will vary with different girls but on average….can’t measure right know but I think I was in the vicinity or 1.25” across….ill measure tonight just to make sure….

Good question… and you answer it well yourself:;

Impossible to tell. One chick might totally get off on 1.5” while another will only be “blown away” by +2”. Although I think that width can work towards pleasuring the ladies I still think that overall PE, for length AND girth AND width, is the way to go. If you already have 6” of girth get cracking on some Pan rolls while you keep your current routine going.

ebon,
I did read your post; however, just because there are two leg-like structures of the clitoris which run down alongside the labia does not mean that those structures offer similarly intense stimulation. I know that from having fingered so many pussies in my youth, that hooded nub which sits atop the snatch seems to be the magic button - and it’s certainly the way most women masturbate. I was asking if a wider cock brought that tip down against the shaft, or if a deeper cock would directly rub that hot-spot more forcefully.

I also agree that pan rolls are very effective. I will commence doing them in a full schedule once I’m a little closer to my length goals. I’m convinced that thicker cock = tougher length gains (tunica gains ofcourse, not lig gains).

Curiously, I believe that my own jelq techniques have contributed to my developing more depth than width. I would always grip forcefully at the sides, believing that I was “working” the CC, which runs along the sides. I would begin a jelq session with a circle grip, but because of my girth, as my unit would inflate, it would become to tedious to always form the “OK” each rep, so I’d often be mainly hitting the sides.

In reality, this would force the pressure downward, into my CS. Pan rolls focus the forces in opposite directions. With your unit (specifically the CS) against a flat hard surface, and by pushing downward, you’re focus the forces out to the sides, into the CC, thereby increasing width.