iamaru
Let’s see if I got this right….You want me to chart the drawings I prick with the measurement? A little complicated but here goes:
First you need a calibrated radii ascpotometer and you place it on the inner echopraxia hypogonadism of the glandual margrabonal cavity, which when said in other terms that can be explained hynagogically speaking without the prior ithyphallic conditions colocates the instrument in a paracentesis menarche position. The utmost and perhaps infusorial positioning of the ascopotometer is near the chamber interconnecting the corpus with the diterpenic podocarps, which is a extremely thalamus ventricle and that under no circumstances must come into dactyl contact with the cistacolan nerves, those at least of which are to be located beneath the epidermis.
Hindrance of erectile tissue caused through lack of correct lentiform nucleus, morefold that situated in the corpus striatun, advocates the presence of micro-deviations when calculating necrotizing fasciitis dimensions, and the natural diatonic state of daltonic mixolydian enzymes result in this rather effulgent process of distortioned measurement.
My advice is the disappendage of said ascopotmeter, alleviating the symptophatic aislations and thus resulting in a non-detrimental synaptic profusion, the calculii then vacillitates transfixations, permitting inprecipitous obduration of the penile shaft.
Should this yield undesired abeyance, a besmirchent and amalgamation of boorishness and gaucherie necessitates the immediate,adequate and amenable sycophancy, which cannot be preceded by anything but predispositioned abstemiousness and an assuage culmination of iberic and lapetus iambuses, which must be evitated at the pertinent risk of mis-calculated measurements.
I’m sure you don’t need a chart now. :head:
